Did strong income growth persist through the pandemic?
If you’re hunting for a home you know that prices have gone up very strongly in Victoria for a long time. In fact they’ve more than quadrupled since 2000. From 2000 to 2021, the average detached house went from $251k to $1.21M (4.80x) while condo prices went from $142k to $562k (3.95x).
What’s less well known is that incomes in Victoria also increased strongly in that period. The median family income in Victoria roughly doubled from $55k in 2000 to to $111k in 2021 (2.02x).
A doubling in income is clearly not enough to offset a quadrupling in home prices, so there’s no doubt that affordability deteriorated substantially in that time. In 2000 with rates at just over 7%, a mortgage payment on the average house took up 32% of the median family income, while in 2021 even with ultralow mortgage rates just over 2%, the average mortgage for a detached house required 45% of that income to service. For condos it’s closer, going from 18% in 2000 to 21% in 2021. A smaller gap than many may expect from a quadrupling in home prices, but it’s not 2021 anymore.
Though nominal prices are little changed from 2021 (they surged in 2022 and were pushed down again by higher rates), the average discounted rate has more than doubled to around 5.5%. That means payments are up some 45%-50% since 2021. Perhaps it’s no surprise that sales are also down 45% since that year.
But what have incomes done since 2021? Well it’s Canada and we don’t believe in timely data in this country, so 2021 is the latest reading here. We do have slightly more updated data to 2022 at the provincial level, and the 2022 median took a substantial dive in real dollars. Real dollars is worth repeating here though. Median family income was up around 2% but in the face of 6% inflation, real incomes dropped.
Back to Victoria though, how do we estimate what happened to incomes since our last data point in 2021? One way is to use weekly wage data by industry, construct a model to match the industries in Victoria, and estimate the increase in family incomes since then. Using that model, we get an increase of 3.2% in 2022, 3.7% in 2023, and 2024 is so far on track for a 4.4% increase, for a total of around 12%.
That increase is nearly identical to inflation, which was just over 12% in the same period, which means that real incomes seem to have made no gains in the last 3 years (but also not lost ground). However in the face of roughly flat prices, that does mean those gains have helped defuse some of the affordability impacts from higher rates. Hard to say where the support level is for affordability, but I’d say absent rate drops, we’d need about 4-5 more years of those kinds of income gains and flat prices to bring affordability back to a reasonable level (you can play with different scenarios in the tool I made last fall).
Speaking of rates, the positive inflation reading means we’ve been in the Bank of Canada target range all year now, signalling rate cuts are likely to come either in the June or July meetings.
The bond market has also relaxed quite a bit in recent weeks, dropping from 3.9% to 3.6% and reducing some pressure on fixed rates. I wouldn’t count on a lot of drops anytime soon though. As I’ve said for a long time, I expect the central banks will be extremely cautious on the way down to ensure they don’t unleash another round of inflation after finally getting it under control.
Also the weekly numbers
| May 2024 |
May
2023
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | Wk 2 | Wk 3 | Wk 4 | ||
| Sales | 111 | 262 | 464 | 775 | |
| New Listings | 344 | 739 | 1131 | 1356 | |
| Active Listings | 3102 | 3206 | 3276 | 2189 | |
| Sales to New Listings | 32% | 35% | 41% | 57% | |
| Sales YoY Change | +5% | -6% | -2% | +2% | |
| New Lists YoY Change | +64% | +40% | +34% | -11% | |
| Inventory YoY Change | +52% | +52% | +55% | +23% | |
| Months of Inventory | |||||
Sales are more or less hanging on to the year ago pace while new lists stay strong.
Don’t be fooled by the drop from the 64% increase in new listings to +34% now. Most of that is due to base effect: May 2023 was a lot better for new listings than earlier months. If this May ends up about 30% higher than last for new listings, it will be the second or third highest May in the last 20 years. Not quite what I would call a flood, but certainly more than we’ve seen in well over a decade and good for house hunters. What’s not evident is any particular rush for the exits from the (speculative) capital gains tax changes beyond a few listings. While policy changes are minor factors, it seems the increase in new inventory is more driven by the continued high rate environment. New listings are fickle though, so I would continue to be hesitant to project the current abundance into the future. Though this one is the most substantial increase, we’ve seen a few swings back to drought with little apparent reason. In a market with a lot of factors at play, new lists are the least predictable part with no solid model to explain them.








New post: https://househuntvictoria.ca/2024/05/27/victoria-bucks-the-population-trend/
City buys crappy Herman’s while blocks away the beautiful Alix Goolden Hall is grossly underused because lawlessness on Pandora blocks access and fire escape route.
15 years ago I biked to several live shows there and double locked my bike outside. Today I wouldn’t dare leave my bike no matter how well locked and there would be no show to see anyhow.
The arc of downtown Victoria ☹️
You can get an okay crowd out for a jazz evening as long as there is free food and alcohol.
Is jazz even a thing anymore? I thought that faded away after the 1929 stock market crash.
Umm really , ya doubt it makes money , just one of those things Vic can just top up , all good.
If it was truly that, it wouldn’t need tax dollars to survive. I guess now that government is involved, the endeavor will be doomed to failure, or at best work as well as healthcare and housing.
She will…She’s no dummy. I have even had Marko involved in this…He’s pissed off Colwood so much with his own development he is of very little use. Infact he’s dangerous.
Max , 1.3 seems thin , why doesn’t she just take it to market
My mother in law owns an 18000 sq/ft ocean front lot down on the esquimalt lagoon. She is sick and tired of paying this land vacancy tax. Colwood is very keen on acquiring this property and have offered her 1.3m. My wife and mother in law were at colwood today in discussions with the mayor and laid the floor at 1.85m.
We’ll see what happens.
Jazz is king , money well spent
Nan.
Relax. The government isn’t running Hermann’s, that’s still the non-profit Arts on View Society that’s been running it for years. Just like the government also won’t be running the business for the upstairs commercial space where they’re actively looking for a tenant. The government are the landlords.
Where was this government when Monty’s and the Fox needed saving?
I really hope that the foods is better than the last few times I was at Hermans.
You can get both, $16 for linguine at Hermann’s.
Maybe sellers are coming around to my theory to price aggressively 🙂
Hmmm, not sure either. I don’t remember that many properties going over ask back then but the numbers don’t lie. I had this feeling that way more properties were going over asking in the current slower market compared to back then.
At least in Ontario they’re buying pasta factories. I like pasta more than jazz.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ev-government-subsidies-corporate-welfare-1.7208003
Detached in the core:
April / May 2024: 51 sales at 1% or more over the asking price out of 286 sales: 17.8%
April / May 2013: 30 sales over ask out of 357 sales: 8.4%
Detached outside the core:
April / May 2024: 17/192: 8.8%
April / May 2013: 20/242: 8.2%
Not sure what to make of that really. Thoughts?
https://househuntvictoria.ca/2024/05/21/did-strong-income-growth-persist-through-the-pandemic/#comment-115808
I don’t think this is an appropriate purchase for a respectable government.
If there is sufficient economic activity in a region to justify this sort of thing in the private sector, it will get built by profit seekers – it did once. “For 34 years, Hermann put his energy and passion towards the creation of a cozy meeting place for established and emerging musicians, and music lovers, from Victoria and Vancouver Island, while attracting talented performers and guests from around the world,” Stephen said in a statement
But hiding a lack of investment in the private sector because your country is an absolute shithole for private business and investing in an anything other than real estate just makes things worse. So now since there is no more passion (i.e. profits) in running this establishment, the government is going to step in, overpay and “run” it? Can’t wait to hear about how much it loses when it gets assigned 19 managers and is filled with government employees that want $40/ hour + tips to do anything, ruins shows with the 6th land acknowledgment I’ve heard that day and how property taxes are going up to continue to subsidize its inefficiency.
Additionally, the net cost of anything is never zero. Something was sold that generated cash. Now that cash can be spent. The cost of the bar is what the bar cost. There is nothing that says the city has to spend it on a bar. Maybe they should invest in more suitable public housing? Or anything really.
Leo, can you see how many properties were selling over asking back in let’s say 2012-2013? compared to now. Just curious.
It’s not allowed unless the municipality allows it. So those hosts in Saanich are taking a risk, but unknown how big of one. It wasn’t allowed before and Saanich didn’t do any enforcement. How much enforcement will the province do on their behalf? No one knows.
Back to the old airbnb convo. What’s the risk of doing airbnb/short term rental in the basement suite of a primary residence in Saanich? I know Saanich doesn’t issue licenses for airbnb like Victoria does. What are the implications of having this type of rental provincially (allowed but w/out municipal license) and municipally (no license)? I still see listings up in our neighbourhood and am wondering if these hosts really know their stuff or are just taking a big risk. Thanks!
Curious if the talk of people holding listings off market until June for the hope of a rate cut comes true (rate cut or not)? If there’s a splooge of new lists in the first two weeks of June, I guess we will have the answer.
Sale price: $1,510,000
List price: $1,299,000
Assessed: $1,219,000
Curious if anyone knows what 2217 Lydia went for?
I tried posting this previously, but I didn’t see it show up right away.
Was just about to say that.. 3500 inventory looks to be the peak for this year by end of June.
Last year inventory kept building until very late into the fall. That was unusual. If we have a more traditional market pattern this year it should peak in June.
I think we will break 800, but my 850 might have been a little optimistic.
The inventory build is starting to slow.
I bought a fixer upper in August 1981 and my recollection was that prices drifted down slowly until 1983. Due to the condition of the house I got a fairly good deal (for the time) and did not feel I was seriously under water until 1983. At that point it felt like they drifted down a little more quickly for a few more years until activity picked up a bit. Sellers that do not have to sell resist capitulating for a long time. My vote would be with the camp that believes the market price will drift sideways for 5+ years to regain some affordability. The other big factor is demographics. The Millennials are a bulge generation just like the boomers were. Once that moves through the house buying stage there will be less pressure as both the preceding and following generations were / are smaller.
Month to date market activity
Sales: 611 (down 2% from same time last year)
New lists: 1441 (up 26%)
Inventory: 3305 (up 52%)
I don’t think we find out until next year. If rates go down it will impact variable more than fixed, as fixed already prices in rate decreases. Later 2025 and 2026, will be the 5 year renewals of people who got big mortgages at low interest rates 5 years ago. There could be some selling pressure if those mortgage payments are hard to maintain. Who knows though…
OFSI real estate and mortgage risk outlook
https://www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca/en/about-osfi/reports-publications/osfis-annual-risk-outlook-fiscal-year-2024-2025#resl
Imo , if the market was going to go down significantly it should have done it by now . Things do seem to be selling , so can only get better with a June rate cut
I think the market might be doing a minor adjustment, would not hold my breath as to major price drops. Getting an impression that the condo market is a bit more shaky than SFH. Marko what is your take.
Seeing the exact same thing every day.
Thank God a specialist has had extensive education and testing to get his credentials so he can treat an amateur carpenter who air nailed his foot to a sheet of plywood.
Just strange. Seeing sale prices on a few that are surprisingly high, but then seeing places sitting there on price reductions that seem like value buys that are not moving.
I understand this isn’t MTV, but it is Saturday night. I would like to pull this one back to the front before I crash for the evening.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCsH1g5ZESk
In my opinion the guy just wanted to put in a bit of extra work and be productive by not letting his unit sit empty half the year, but productivity is something that we try to punish in Canada with over-regulation and taxes. The specialist doctor is making too much, let’s increase his or her taxes….well have fun waiting 6 months to see a specialist and sitting in emerge for 10 hrs to get an antibiotic for something simple.
Someone wants to build their own house? How about no, let’s add a unnecessary barrier to that.
Etc.
Bitter Sweet Symphony – The Verve
You gotta check this shit out…Its amazing how they pull it all together.
If you listen, it totally explains the times we are currently living.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iE_CGC8LGUQ
I was so nervous that I nearly missed.
Leo , in a hot market realtors become auctioneers already lol
Look at this photograph … every time I do it makes me laugh
Are you happy in life?
But he would have had to qualify for his mortgage without taking any of this income into account. So basically the same political/regulatory risk that’s applicable to all investments.
That’s how Marko rolls.
We should do this
https://x.com/marketurbanism/status/1794192078874013936?s=61&t=yQOlkjf_OqMVYckMZE3bgQ
My point of these three posts below. Without the use of an online portal, two of these bands wouldn’t even be a thing.
Napster was the portal. This gave them the exposure and in the end made them millions. Now we have this online airbnb portal with the potential to make people thousands. Without this portal and the exposure it brings this wouldn’t even be a thing.
Since this is my principle residence of 20+ years I should be allowed to use airbnb as a portal as long as I am on premise.
I am trying to convince my wife that we should put the garden suite to work. She’s not biting, she doesn’t think we are allowed.
We are a stones throw away from starlight stadium with both pacific fc and rugby canada the demand for str in this area is big.
I just can’t bare to witness that garden suite not working. I’m pretty sure I’m allowed to make a hotel out of that suite full time using the airbnb portal as long as I’m on premise. Am I legally allowed to do this? In Langford?
Nickelback was playing Victoria in local pubs…Look at them now.
Lots of talent has been spawned from Victoria.
Bryan Adams grew up just down the road on triangle mountain right here in Langford.
These guys used to play Victoria all the time down at the forge, brass rail, king john, or where ever. Just small gigs. They all became multi millionaires… Topping the charts.
Correct, and he purchased a short term rental zoned unit specifically so he could rent it 1/2 the year due to his on/off work schedule on the boats.
Patrick , totally agree , Herman’s is a gem has a great old school feel and having been to some great jazz clubs around the world , I feel it’s up there with a Ronnie Scott’s
Okay so, str are totally under the government scope at this time. Then we have ltr which is also under the government scope but also has the added risk of a “cash for keys” tenant. Are you guys ever going to give up on this renting thing?
They have their eyes all over this shit.
Speculation tax, land vacancy tax, money laundering…The jig is up.
If you sell your principle residence, even after living it for 20 years…You had better check that box when you file.
They want foreign investment out of real estate.
So he can do 4x under 30 days then the 5th time he has to do 30 days or over?
Jazz is too jazzy. I hate horns, it reminds me of war times. I do however like the bagpipes that follow.
Yes, it was a brilliant move by the city of Victoria to purchase Hermann’s for $4 million. This is an iconic club for live jazz, blues etc. and is well known among jazz musicians around the world. Tourism, arts and culture are a big part of Victorias economy. Live music is a reason for people to go downtown in the evenings. The (initial) net cost to the city is $0 since it’s funded by them selling other land/property. So a win/win.
https://www.vicnews.com/local-news/victoria-buys-hermanns-jazz-club-to-sustain-and-support-live-music-downtown-7330896
That’s great. I listen to this rockin1000 band all weekend long down in my garage.
Here is the link to their channel…
https://www.youtube.com/@rockin1000_official
This ones killer…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iE_CGC8LGUQ
That argument is very weak, especially coming from a lawyer. I wasn’t even talking about partnership.
If they don’t do anything and are not productive…Yes.
And a law firm is the epiphany of corporate greed.
I see BC housing is going ahead with 40 units of supportive housing in Vic Est. Dont they also have a large number of units planned for the proposed Roundhouse development?
Max, you seem to have trouble understanding the nature of a partnership. For example most law firms in BC are corporate entities. Basically a group of lawyers who are a partnership. Do you see the other lawyers as some form of debt?
He works 21 days on/off so 30 days doesn’t work for him. After he uses up his 4x he is out of luck.
Not going to be too attractive to anyone who doesn’t already pay Canadian income taxes. I well remember Howard Hughes’ months-long visit to the Bayshore Hotel back in the 1970’s. Took up a whole floor. Suddenly left days before he would have been considered a resident for Canadian income tax.
I’ll tell you a little story about a boat guy. He lives on a derelict boat in cadboro bay down by peppers. He knocked off our job site along with three other houses in the area. The cops said…Yeah we know the guy…Nothing we can do about it.
If its 30 days then wtf is that boat guy at the janion keep whining?
Dude, that is a ponzi scheme.
Explain to me how that is not debt. That tells me you were not operating a profitable business and had to bring in outside help (shareholders) to save your ass from default. Now you have a business partner(s) that you have to pay monthly or annually (debt) until you can afford to buy them out.
Black is black, red is red. It has always been this way…Don’t go into the red.
Max , I checked it out very cool . Also we the people just bought Herman’s , great local musicians playing for door , so they are worth supporting lots of great talent in this lil city
Its Friday. Its been a long week. I don’t know if any of you guys appreciate music. Music is a universal language just like arithmetic.
There is this 1000 member band. Its the biggest band in the world. It doesn’t matter your race, gender, sex orientation, or age. It is just a 1000 member band gathered in unison to sing a song.
You guys should check it out…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ul8vqaGGnY0
Happy Friday.
Max. shareholder are not debt, they are owners of the business, You can increase capital by issuing new shares but you are then diluting the degree of ownership of the previous shareholders. (I dont want to go into the intricacies of preferred shares for obvious reasons).
Which I think is absolute bullshit! I want to buy the banana…I don’t want to buy the shareholder wealth creation!
If you can’t operate a business without perpetual debt (a share holder). You are running a ponzi scheme.
If it were a profitable business in need of expansion…The business could afford this expansion on its own.
IMO.
I agree with this to some degree. Shareholder wealth creation also implicates us as individuals. Most people want their portfolios to increase in value, regardless of what it takes to get those returns. Number up == good, number down == bad.
Sure, some executives have bigger gains than those with RRSPs/etc., but ultimately most of us with securities and such want similar things, maybe just to different degrees.
1) That would be a death blow…Just more tents.
2) We are already doing that.
3) With the petroleum costs these days, not gasoline, just what goes into these building materials these days…Not gonna happen.
It is all about corporate greed. There is nothing more to say…It is the ugly truth.
There’s nothing we can do about it, the government is tied to the hip with these guys…It is what it is.
All we can do is work hard, make our family life as happy as we can…And that’s that.
Don’t forget strata bylaws as well which in my case is 30 days minimum.
90 days is on non-prinicpal residence at the provincial level, there is no restriction on principal residence.
I guess the legal question is the 5th separate occassion does it have to be 30 days or 90 days, I would argue 30 days.
If the answer is 90 days then I don’t see who would enforce that? The province wouldn’t because it is principal residence (no restrictions) and I’ve talked to the COV short term rental department multiple times and they are okay with 30 day rentals.
Frank + Max, I listened to a Global & Mail podcast recently (https://open.spotify.com/episode/6BNnz3piVSs0yX5YgAqHtw?si=325a285d9e6845c8) indicating that “affordable” is calculated based on median income in a particular city. However, this includes both homeowners and renters, which hurts affordability metrics. The reality is we can’t get builders to build if only considering renter income, big subsidies would be necessary (or just government doing it).
Ugly truth I see about building in this era is you either: 1) let the market decide 2) subsidize/tax 3) reduce building costs.
#3 would be my ideal, but that one seems the hardest (technologically and politically).
This is interesting @Leo when compared to the rest of BC. I’m curious how the distribution of Victoria across nationalities and remote workers differs from the rest of BC. Given its proximity and desirability, I imagine Victoria would be a big destination for highly paid remote workers and Americans with big pockets. That might skew the data for even the median incomes in Victoria if a high enough % of workers fit into these categories.
Are there any other competitive portals other than airbnb? They seem to just be focused on the airbnb portal at this time.
People ratting you out would be another risk you would take. Noncompliance is nothing new.
Also hi Warren, your previous comments about all real estate investments being a gamble got me thinking. Gotta know when to hold em, know when to fold em. I agree. I don’t agree that a rental property is never cash positive but we can agree to disagree on that one. Cheers
Thanks for the replies. I’m not in COV and we’re looking at doing it in our suite full time instead of renting long term as we’ve done for many years. This is anecdotal but we know lots of people doing the same thing and I do wonder if leaving that as an option for people will limit rental housing in the long run as landlords have tenants move out and they have a new option. The government got their small surge of listings and long term rentals by putting in the restrictions they did, but I wonder if they’ve hurt rental housing in the longer term. We haven’t decided yet, but it’s appealing. I also find it funny that my tenants can air bnb my property while they’re away on vacation as Marco pointed out he does.
It gets you a new row house with very little parking. If you prefer ebikes It could be a good fit.
The general principle is that provincial legislation prevails over municipal unless the provincial legislation actually makes provision for the municipal rules to take precedence. Therefore generally speaking municipal bylaws can’t permit (or require) something that provincial law prohibits.
However municipal bylaws can usually impose stricter standards than provincial laws providing (1) it is on a subject where municipalities are empowered to make bylaws (2) Compliance with the municipal bylaw doesn’t somehow make it impossible to comply with provincial law
So in essence it ends up exactly what you said. Either provincial law or a stricter local bylaw
says Leo and then follows up with the data-geek equivalent of a body slam
isn’t it just the most strict standard prevail? So basically in COV you can only rent your principal residence on 4 separate occasions per year if the length of stay is less than 90 days?
sounds like you have no idea what you are talking about….
The information in the article is not at odds with that statement. The widening gap between average and median real incomes could be explained by experienced workers receiving more promotions than less experienced and by more experienced workers being retained than less experienced during downturns. Although the data here isn’t enough to support that idea.
Booby k , ya I would say the 50 to 100 k collector buyer is more emotional. Once u get in the higher end stuff say 500 k up , it’s going to be investment. The returns on Ferrari, Porsche , mercedes etc at auction have been phenomenal .
~200k a year gets a townhouse Langford?
It would be interesting to know how much this rise in real income is related to the hiring practices one of our key employers. This entity has no accountability, no restrictions to budget or to salaries, no limits to staffing, and creates entitled employees who essentially have jobs and pensions for life without once having their abilities or performance judged against any business metric.
Some of these employees even have a nice side-line in lightly-used wood-splitters. I can put you in touch.
Thurston, correct me if i’ m wrong but dont high classic car values correspond to demographics, what I mean is don’t values go up as people who grew up with a certain car reach their high net worth years and look to relive their youth. Last time I checked the value of a Model T is fairly low. This is different of course for limited production model cars.
Easy to say that wages will always go up just like everything else. I hang out in the collector car world and I’m always floored by very ordinary cars getting big bucks . The low interest rates have pumped up a lot different assets
Curious if anyone knows what 2217 Lydia went for?
Leo, as mentioned the average age of Canadians has increased over that time from 36 to 41, with increased education and job automation, TFW’s and given that people earn more as they get older this might explain some of the difference.
In terms of house price increases above historical norms over that period we have many factors as listed above such as more 2 parent working households, greaty reduced mortgage rates, older population which leads to higher incomes, increased immigration, more government regulations driving up building costs, increased commodification of residential real estate and on and on. I look forward to a reversal of a few of theae factors which could lead to low future home price equity returns with a revsion to the mean for returns.
And if anyone is wondering I am not a real estate bear or wannabe owner, I am a member of Generation X who purchased a home in an affluent part of town after university in 2001, I could care less what happens to real estate prices, all I want is a healthy region where young familes dont need to compete with “investors” to own their own home and raise a family.
Fairly easy to check that though. Average hours worked at all jobs in BC:
2000: 38.1
2023: 38.0
(table 14-10-0043-01)
No movement there so it’s not that individuals are working more hours.
As for whether families in general have grown and incomes are up because more people are contributing, in table 11-10-0190 you can pull the number of persons vs number of families, and persons/family has gone down from 2.32 in the year 2000 in BC to 2.16 in 2022. Consistent iwth average household size also down, so if anything incomes are up despite fewer people per family.
Could it be that participation rates are up? Seemingly no. 65.5% in 2000 and 65% in 2023
Yes, people really are earning more!
I personally look at wages of 2x government employees which are somewhat correlated to nursing/teachers/police/fire/etc., and basically two of those incomes set a floor on a median type of real estate product which right now is probably a townhome in Langford.
Despite a large amount of inventory when it comes to Langford townhomes the prices really aren’t seeing substantially downward pressure and I think that is because 1000s of people fit the profile described above.
At the end of the day if people can afford they buy and with wage increases over time affordability does improve.
Don’t know about hours but highly doubt productivity is up….had a close friend from Ottawa call me yesterday venting that there is some new policy that he now has to go to the office three days a week 🙂
It is, but in itself it doesn’t tell us whether it’s due to real wages going up or due to more hours worked per family, including increased workforce participation. In particular, an increase in young employed people living at home rather than on their own will increase family income numbers.
Also keep in mind that individual wages tend to peak after 50, so the increase in size of this cohort over the last 20 years may be a factor. Doesn’t help those outside the cohort.
Gee maybe that’s why I also showed a chart of real incomes going up in BC.
After 25 years of real incomes going sideways before 2000, the fact that real incomes went up quite a bit after 2000 is absolutely notable. The reason I posted it is because many people don’t know this. It’s not enough to counter the even faster increases in house prices as I showed in the article. But that doesn’t change the fact that we’ve had a strong couple decades in incomes whether you want to believe it or not
Whateveriwanttocallmyself. That is a great question. The short answer is yes, the bank should then be allowed to foreclose on the land that was put up for collateral.
The long answer is you cannot treat The Nations as both equals and as children not mature enough to make their own decisions. The Nations like countries and governments should be allowed to succeed and fail based on the merits of their decisions. If democratically elected Chiefs and Councils want to take on loans by using their assets as collateral they should be allowed to.
We are all conditioned by the responses to our decisions. Currently the way the system is designed is Nations get rewarded (by having more money) for knowing how to get funded but rarely rewarded for knowing how to use it well. I would even go as far to say they are negatively rewarded because if they use it well ISC will give them less money as they see them as having less need.
Also when you are thinking of land being “mortgaged” don’t only think of reserves and don’t only think of permanent ownership. The better way of thinking about it is as collateral. Lets say First Nation “A” wants to build a pulp mill because they have the resources for it and think it will provide great economic opportunities. They need 100 million dollars to do so. The bank says we’re willing to loan you the money but for the collateral we want a certain portion of reserve land and First Nation “A” to give up their mineral and hunting rights. I think the Nation should be allowed to do that and in a legally binding way so both parties have trust that the deal will be followed.
Lets look at another example. First Nation “B” is located very remotely in Northern Manitoba and due to the realities of geography a sizeable portion of their population has to go to Winnipeg for health needs, economic opportunities, education, etc… Manitoba Hydro wants to run some transmission lines through their land. First Nation “B” says we’ll give you a certain area of our reserve but in return we want a small urban reserve near Winnipeg. I think this kind of deal should be allowed as both parties benefit from it and it is done in a legally binding way so they both trust the clearly defined rules of the agreement will be followed.
Lets look at another example. There are ten First Nation tribes that are under Treaty 2. First Nation 1 wants to purchase from Nations 2-10 their claims to a certain area beside their reserve so they can have additional land for housing. Should the other Nations be allowed to trade claims and lands amongst themselves. I think they should.
There have been many agreements made between the government and various First Nations that have not been followed. Some have been followed to the letter but not their intent. The current government might be the product of the past but is not them. Similarly the current First Nations are descended from the original signatories but are now familiar with how the Canadian government thinks and operates. With consent from both sides new agreements should be able to be formed and old ones amended in a manner that is predictable and enforceable.
The first thing in my opinion that needs to be changed so reconciliation can move forward is reserve land no longer belonging to “Her Majesty” as it currently does but the land title being given to the Nations. They should not be treated like children. The freedom we have to make their own choices is being denied to them. This freedom cannot be present without the possibility of having the freedom to make unwise choices.
Complete sewerage system
Patriotz , saw it on Global news live with Sofia lui
I think that analogy is nothing more than a pipe dream. The boomers will not just die off in one day, and not everyone that owns a house is a boomer. I would say more boomers are in condos or assisted living. If they are in a house and die off, they’ll just leave it to the kids. If the kids had any brains they would understand that its far better to rent it out long term and hold the asset for 10+ years, then consider selling it at a much more inflated price.
Yes because COV is 30 days. As I said you need to draw out a ven diagram for this including provincial, muncipal, and revenue Canada and who knows what else regulations and definitions.
Nan, you have it right we are eating our young.
“27% of adults ages 30 to 34 had a child in their household in 2023, compared with 60% in 1993” in the US.
Its sad, so many younger couples say they don’t plan on haviing children or more likely don’t feel they can afford to have children. But what do we do, politicians continue to increase support for the elderly whle the younger generation is barely thought of as they are a larger voting block. Meanwhile elderly people such as Patrick tell younger people to stop complaining and get into the market no matter what the cost.
When the baby boom generation is on its way out all that will be left is a country with higher taxes and huge debt and a projected “silver tsunami” where house prices drop dramtically as boomers die off.
But if you do it for 89 days at a time then that is still conisdered STR. You had stated under 30 days before.
I don’t know where you got that number, but the largest number of people affected live in the US, which has by far the largest number of Canadians living outside the country.
2 million new Canadians with changes to immigration today . More folks chasing after homes here , sweet
Yes, but you can SRT your principal residence under provincial regulations.
Garth Turner had a shit load of squirrel recipes back in 2008 when he told us we were all gonna die. This is no shit, there were tutorials on how to skin them, gut them, and saute them.
MunEng, let’s hypothetically make it that the Chief of the Band can mortgage the reserve at a Bank.
If the Band doesn’t make payments should the Bank be allowed to foreclose and sell the land to the highest bidder which may be a non native?
I’m betting you’re going to say no. And that should give you the reason why native lands should not be mortgaged.
We love costco. If they had a really good online shopping cart system in place with home delivery they would have the market dialed. We drop a grand per month there. When you have a family of four with 1 dog and 3 cats it only makes sense.
Kinda like sysco for residents.
https://www.sysco.ca/location/victoria
LMAO, wait until you see the density that will be coming to gordon head.
Marko, isn’t STR in COV anything less than 90 days now given the new provincial rules?
This site is so funny – 15 years ago it used to be an RE doomer site, now I am 100% certain that now that all the posters have capitulated, it’s a pumper site.
For the record, income growth isn’t strong in Canada over the last 20 years. 60% of that nominal increase is just inflation. At least the rest of the difference (maybe more) is due to more labor being contributed to jobs that pay the same or worse by the average family. I know some parents in their 60s who had one non working parent. Some in their 50’s with 1 full time and 1 parent sort of worked. I know some parents in their 40’s with 1.75 full time jobs. 100% of the parents in their 30s I know work full time at real jobs with real responsibility. The younger you are the harder you have to work and the more you have to sacrifice to come up with the money to fill the gap between decreasing real incomes and increasing COL, especially in housing. Presenting nominal family income “going up” as something positive out of context of all the other factors at play is complete and utter nonsense.
Fyi in COV you can only do STR four times per year in your pricinpal residence so that would need to be a pretty unique situation where you are collecting over 30k on four stays under 30 days.
But the rules are a huge mess. Whenever anyone asks a question on FB/Reddit there are 10 different responses. Problem is provisional legislation is not aligned with municipal. It’s like one of those ven diagrams trying to figure out what you can’t and can do.
I posted this last week but I don’t think it showed up. Does anyone here know if you decide to run a STR out of your home, as allowed by the new rules, if you need a GST number? Previously you needed one if it was a separate property, but I haven’t heard if that’s the case under these new rules and the regulations aren’t clear from what I’ve seen. Or, is it just like long term rent where it’s just added to your income?
In Winnipeg, First Nations negotiations for Kapyong barracks took 22 years. A shovel is still not in the ground. Our new premier wants to put a casino on the land. Great idea, not.
China probably isn’t the best example
1) China built a bunch of housing but a lot of it is sitting vacant because they built it in places no one wants to live while big cities have some of the highest property prices relative to income in the world. With the big development companies going bankrupt so many people have lost their entire life savings. Plus the quality of housing is atrocious.
2) Local government in China get a large part of their budget by selling (technically leasing) land. This is great while property prices are going through the roof. When it goes bad like it did now it causes immense problems. It also creates terrible incentives on a long term bases for the local governments that they always have to continue to build and expand. What has stopped expanding in China? The population.
Your point of taking in farmland to start building is correct though. Greenbelts and hard city limits are a good idea as they encourage densification and limit urban sprawl up to a point. The trick should be that once an area reaches a certain density further expansion is to be permitted.
Also dealing with First Nations Land is… tricky to say the least. I often do work on various reserves and have come to realise the way the laws work for First Nation Land means that almost everyone is worse off but not enough to make enough Nations want to handle the short term pain of reforms (if reforms are even possible) for the long term gains.
1) Canada does not have clearly defined land rights for First Nations. This hurts them in so many ways the main one being uncertainty and delays. Is there a disagreement, great looks like everyone will be tied up in the courts for 10 years. Any land that might have even a small chance of claims by First Nations, have fun in court for 10 years. Trying to build any kind of infrastructure and you get 9 out of 10 Nations that are impacted to support you (usually happily because of the economic opportunities) but one does not, have fun in court for 10 years. 10 out of 10 Nations support the project but 5 years in one of the Nations gets a new leader who opposes it, have fun in court for 10 years. Any kind of decent size project that requires government approval being done means there is a “duty to consult and accommodate” with First Nations. The three criteria that were established by Haida vs BC are very easy to trigger and have no maximum timeline. So 10 years in court again.
2) First Nations cannot borrow against their land. This is the most common way of getting a loan and Capital is so important when trying to build anything. The courts might say the Nations have a right for self determination but won’t even let them use their own land for collateral.
Honestly I could go for so long about this but I don’t think that would be helpful. I have worked with various level of governments and many departments in different provinces. I have rarely even disliked anyone. Most of them have been trying to do their job well and make the world around them a better place. Often the rules and regulations they have to enforce are onerous but in general do more good than harm. The only ones I notice that do far more harm than good were the ones put in place by the Supreme Court. The harm they have caused by only thinking about fairness and not the realistic outcomes of their decision has hurt Canadians in so many ways they will never know. The people that have been hurt most of all have been the First Nations.
I really do hate the SCC. They will make rules and regulations by stretching the interpretation of documents to get decisions they think is morally right and then give a broadly definable way to trigger them but no measurable way of saying when these have been met. Fairness is important but not at the cost of all practicality.
The Eastern Grey Squirrel (aka the bushy tailed rodents in Beacon Hill Park) are an invasive introduced species. They can be hunted and trapped without license or permit or bag limit (unlike deer for instance). https://www.env.gov.bc.ca/van-island/wildweb/pdf/Squirrel_FAQ_10_July_09.pdf.
The internet is awash with squirrel recipes and in fact my very ancient edition of joy of cooking (since replaced) even had a squirrel recipe. You’ll be doing a favour for both the ecosystem and your pocketbook.
There are several locations that would make ideal Box Store sites and they are large parcels on First Nation’s lands. Admirals and Craigflower roads? Mt. Newton Cross Road and Lochside?
That’s not going to go over well with the adjoining municipalities for collecting property and business taxes. To get housing built -everyone has to get a piece of the money pie. The problem is there are too many people that want a slice of that pie.
The natives have been burned in the past – they are not going to be this time around.
China now has a surplus of housing with about 65 million vacant condominiums.
So how did China manage not just to meet future populations needs – but surpass them?
One way was the use of Eminent Domain. When a Committee in China decides to build something – it takes over all of the surrounding land without regards to how may residents live there. The land owners are compensated and usually at generous amounts. That usually means that the district will get up to 20 acres of land at a time that will be ready to be developed in 6 to 7 months. The Committee then sells the land off to dozens of developers to recoup their initial cost and more as the city makes the profit from up zoning rather than the land owner.
For Greater Victoria that might mean hundreds of acres of farmland near the urban core such as Tanner Ridge, Keating Cross Roads, Saanichton, Granville, Hospital, Blenkinsop Valley?
Basically, the district governments and committees become land developers.
We have done this in the past when the land around the proposed Veterans Parkway was purchased from single family home owners. The government then up zoned the land surrounding the parkway tor multi-family housing.
It’s doubtful that we would do such a thing. Mostly because every city planner’s head would explode as it goes against densification but rather towards nodes of high density areas surrounded by low density houses. It is also more expensive to the tax payer as the costs are initially born by the city. With infill developments the costs are paid by the individual developers to extend services to their site which slows down the development process as the developer has to hold the land until prices rise to make the development economically feasible.
But those damn Communists did get a lot of housing built in a very short time period.
I’ve heard varying stories/recollections of the events leading up to Costco coming to Victoria, but I think I looked it up a few years ago and, if memory serves, Costco originally wanted to locate itself in the light industrial area on Keating Cross Road but residents kicked up too much of a fuss so they went to Plan B — Langford.
Mind you, a Costco on Keating isn’t particularly close to where most of the CRD’s population lives. For example, it’s about the same distance from Gordon Head to there as it is from GH to Langford.
What we really needed was for a second Costco to go in either where the Hillside Canadian Tire is now or where the Hillside Walmart is now. Or at Uptown.
During my first 13 or so years in Victoria, I never once set foot in Costco. Treated it like a badge of honour. Then, a few years ago, I started getting annoyed by how much I was overpaying for things like cheese, coffee, EVOO, and tp. So I begrudgingly began shopping at Costco once every 1-2 months to stock up on select items. Saves me a bundle, but boy do I dislike how busy it is, and it’s only getting worse.
Maybe I’ll go to Costco when I am retired. Right now my free time is worth too much to me to bother trekking out to the Westshore for groceries.
Gosig, you left out the farmers markets, independent butchers and fish mongers and a number of specialty stores for great ethnic food.
I guess it is back to beating a deer over the head with a hammer and pulling out the old venison recipes.
I like Cosco but you have to be careful since the prices are not necessarily the best for all items. I have found it interesting at how much the West Shore has grown in the last ten years. I wonder why more government jobs are not moved out to the West Shore?
why would someone called “Introvert” willing go into a Costco? did you lose a bet?
i know i must face the stress and anxiety of a visit the dentist or to the airport … but i don’t have to go into a Costco
Even if they are selling gold plated Fillet Mignon at $0.02/lb i will pass.
Sadly though, as you know from social media, there are limited choices to grocery shopping in Canada.
Other than Thriftys, Save-on-Foods, Fairways, Walmart, Country grocery, Root Cellar, Quality Foods, Red Barn, Market-Stores, Whole Foods, or even (gasp) Loblaws, there really is no where to shop.
I remember when Costco was the ultimate NIMBY issue in Victoria (well, right next to the 40 year anti-sewage plant campaign). The City of Victoria banned box stores and when it was announced it was going into Langford they rallied to try to stop it there as well. Anyways, anytime you feel the Costso here is busy, go to the mainland and step through the doors of the one in Burnaby and the Costco in Langford will feel near empty by comparison.
The Comox Valley, population 72,445, has a Costco.
The CRD should have two Costcos based on our population. But it only has one, and it’s twice as busy as it should be.
Can you tell I shopped at Costco today?
Expect to see alot more generational houses moving forward.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/canada-bc-multi-generational-housing-affordable-1.7134448
I’d say its a number so low that no one will build anything for them.
It would have to be something along the lines of a prison facility, without the bars.
Subsidized by the fed.
The majority of young adults in Canada cannot even afford “affordable” rents. What exactly is this mythical “affordable” number? I’ve never seen any hard numbers from any level of government. I doubt they have a clue.
Frank, are you sure you’re not from Vault 32 ?
Well boo hoo, it was never supposed to be that way. How about get a job to make the mortgage payments!
If you are banking on rental income to survive, I’d say you are treading thin ice.
IMO.
I think if we build enough purpose built rentals that will break the investment market in condos and houses and lead to lower sustainable home prices. Even pushing the vacancy rate for condos and basement suites to 5% to 10% would cause home prices to decline as the rents won’t cover the home owner’s mortgage payments.
The weakest link in the housing market is the rental market. Empowering prospective renters with a a comprehensive data base would help considerably in their search and comparison shopping.
The BC and municipal governments would probably give someone a grant to set something up.
Perhaps this explains the ghost cities of China. Their way didn’t work.
I don’t know Max, are they building them in China?
So is brown brothers building all these rental units just to be nice?
No, even in communist countries like China, housing is a commodity that is bought, sold and speculated on just like in capitalist countries. In recent years, more social housing has been made available in the form of subsidized rental housing for those in need. Units are not only offered at affordable rates to low-income residents but also to migrant workers who cannot afford the market rent due to their low wages.
I thought the government was subsidizing all these new rental builds?
Housing, commercial property, warehouses, retail space(malls), office buildings, etc… all fall under the category of real estate and require the investment of individuals or corporations to create in a capitalistic society. Without a reasonable return of investment, it simply doesn’t get done. I assume in communist countries, the government provides housing, and we all know how well that’s worked out.
Peter Gosniak – The fact that housing has returned roughly the same as the S&P is an issue in a couple of ways. 1) when the return of equity so far outstrips the return on labor, the divide between lowest and highest earners becomes greater and greater. i.e. disappearing middle class. 2) Treating housing as an investment that can or should have the same returns as the stock market is incredibly inefficient from a productivity perspective.
Maybe you should give your head a shake.
2958 Irma sold for $850k. Closes May 31st.
Did Zealty stop sharing sold data for the island? I don’t see them anymore when I log on. Can anyone please tell me what 2958 Irma St sold for?
Peter , I would agree , and house prices should double up in 10 years , making today as cheap as chips
S&P 500 has returned 450% since 2000. Maybe house prices are right where they should be…likely not a correlation but thought provoking on where someone should invest their cash?
Patrick, I actually googled average American household net worth median. Median US family net worth in 2021 seems to be above 200k. Canadian net median worth is around 300k in Canadian dollars. There is a gap but most of it seems to hinge on a very expensive real estate market in Canada.
I glanced through the article, and I may have missed it, but what statistics are they using? Maybe one of the Statistical Gods here can help out and give us a clear picture.
No. The the real income one says 2022 dollars, and that’s the year we’re talking about. No inflation adjustment needed.
And it just happens that the average Canadian house price is roughly 2X the average US house price.
Two ways to think about it.
I have no strong opinion about it, I stopped putting in the end of month sales forecasts because they were always all over the place
You sort of answered the question yourself. One chart is real income, i.e. inflation adjusted, but the other is nominal.
Well, as BoC has already noted there are going to be a lot of people renewing mortgages at much higher rates within the next year or so. This will have the same impact on demand as an actual rate increase. And following on what Peter said, fewer people in the US will see big mortgage increases since many have 30 year or other long range terms.
I think it's like hockey, you should skate to where the puck's going, not where it's been. In Canada, it's a clearer picture than in the US, ie. one of economic slowdown, and so a clearer case for rate declines beginning pretty soon so that we don't tip into recession if we don't need to.
In the US, I'd argue that you're right and that there's no reason to cut rates right now, as economic growth and inflation drivers still seem fairly robust, so it will take more time and cuts will probably be less. You can see in the US stock market the movement from "hey we're going to have a recession, great – the rates will come down fast (?!)" to "wait a minute, doesn't look like that's happening, the economy is strong, damn, what about the rate cuts" to "well, let's focus on the fact that the economy is pretty robust". It's a tussle where bad news is good news, until finally good news is good news.
I agree that in neither country rates are really all that high, just sort of normal. What makes them 'high' is the huge amount of debt that's been built up and the end of the abnormally low period of rates.
USD rose against most currencies over last 10 years (except Swiss CHF).
Canada dollar was flat or up against most currencies over last 10 years (except USD and Swiss CHF).
So you’d feel poorer or richer depending in which currency you compare with.
But if you have to compare with the US, this should make Canadians feel richer.
https://www.financialsamurai.com/the-average-canadian-household-net-worth-is-huge/
“The average Canadian household net worth is surprisingly huge at roughly $680,000 in 2021, up from $400,151 in 2012 according to Statistics Canada. The average Canadian household net worth is roughly 2X the average U.S. household net worth.“
We had 202 sales last week, is there any reason (seasonal or other) that sales would be slower this week? Not sure if the stat plays into it much as we had Monday type sales numbers yesterday.
And then add 180 for the following week as we are missing Saturday/Sunday
And that’s my napkin math.
Great article Leo.
Maybe you could elaborate on the differences in two of your charts.
—— The “mean and median real family income in BC” shows BC median income (2022) to be $79,000
—— The Victoria “total median family income” chart shows Victoria “total” median income (2022) to be about $116,000
Is this apple-to-apples? If so, Victoria median incomes are way higher (+46% higher) than BC incomes. A 46% difference between Victoria and BC seems unlikely, and they must be measuring different things. What?
Same number of business days this May as last and so far we’re lagging a tiny bit, you think we’ll get to 850?
Victoria growth on the low end of Canada
I wanted to know what people thought about future (possible) rate cuts.
Why is there all this talk about cutting rates this coming of June when inflation is still in the upper range of 1-3%. Isn’t that an indication that rates are close to where they should be? Why wouldn’t cuts only start when inflation 3 and cut when you’re <1?
Sales aren’t actually that bad, will be above median.
2024 estimate – 850
2023 – 775
2022 – 761
2021 – 1,049
2020 – 457
2019 – 848
2018 – 755
2017 – 1,008
2016 – 1,289
2015 – 905
2014 – 714
2013 – 659
2012 – 659
2011 – 572
2010 – 695
Trudeau is trying his best to make me poorer.
Frank, one of many factors is that there was a surge of baby boomers buying with no major increase of the number of SFH being built.
Now if you really want to have an additional interesting projection of Canadians income or actual purchasing power on the international stage convert incomes over the last ten years into USD. If you are feeling poorer it is because you actually are poorer in most cases. It is not a straight one to one calculation (as I am sure that many will point out) but it should really give you pause to think ( well at least in a couple of cases).
In the last 25 years income has doubled, detached houses are up 4.8 times. Why?