Dec 17 Market Update and the Top Comments
Weekly sales numbers courtesy of the VREB.
| December 2018 |
Dec
2017
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | Wk 2 | Wk 3 | Wk 4 | ||
| Sales | 129 | 226 | 462 | ||
| New Listings | 158 | 272 | 441 | ||
| Active Listings | 2211 | 2146 | 1384 | ||
| Sales to New Listings | 82% | 83% | 105% | ||
| Sales Projection | 415 | 410 | |||
| Months of Inventory | 3.0 | ||||
Not much change in the market last week. About 10% fewer sales than a year ago with a third more listings on the market.
The median single family property is selling about 8% higher than assessed value while for condos it’s about 13%, Of course those assessed values are now 18 months old and are about to be updated to the 2018 values. Assessments will be going up for most people this year, and unless the market picks up I wouldn’t be surprised to see the average place sell for under assessed value in 2019. That assessed value is a powerful psychological tool though, and I expect to see more unrealistic asking prices for listings once owners get the letter saying their house is worth more.

Recently CMHC has teamed up with Equifax and they are releasing a lot more statistics about the level of indebtedness of Canadians. As Rob from RateSpy put it, Ottawa is playing whack a mole with Canadians’ debt. It seems that households are determined or forced to fund their spending with debt and regulatory measures to contain this are finding that many consumers are shifting to other sources of debt rather than curtailing the spending. To no great surprise, the high priced markets have the highest debt to income ratios. However perhaps worth noting is that Victoria’s ratio has not changed in the past 3 years, despite rapid escalation of house prices.

We recently rolled over 50,000 comments, of which some 18,000 were from this year. A few months ago I enabled a comment voting system and someone suggested posting some of the most-voted comments for the year. The absolute top voted comments often only make sense in context, or are snarky replies to others, so instead I applied my arbitrary and capricious selection criteria to some of the highly voted comments from this year. Those are featured below:
“Residential real estate has become a parasite. Period. For the economy to become fundamentally sound and for average people to feel some financial security (see graph above) it has to end and the end will be painful unfortunately. more…” – Beancounter
“In life the time to do something will never “be right.” There will always be reasons not to: ask that girl out, apply for that job, take that course, buy a house, have kids and the list goes on. But to do them it requires a little faith in your own ability and the that that future will be better then it is today. more…” – Mayfair Man
“If it takes two full time highly paid jobs to buy a house in a metro of under half a million, you have a crisis.” – Patriotz
“I hear all the time from those who already own, typically people who are 40 years old and up, how great it is to have a house in addition to investments and how we’re all missing out if we don’t have one. These are people who’s house has tripled in value since they bought it 25 years ago so I recognize why they say this. But then those same people also tell me things like ‘I don’t know how people these days can want to pay $4,000 per month in mortgage + property taxes, that’s just too much!’ The reality is that at today’s prices and rates that’s what it takes to own a detached house, ~$4k per month. We don’t want to pay it but it’s the reality. For 30 year olds with two middle or upper middle class incomes these days that’s not putting some of your money into a house, it’s putting all of it. And I mean sacrificing a lot of things to do so as well beyond simply the down payment. more…” – Robin
“I love the new energy in the city in the form of smart, progressive young people. I just want a city where all income levels,ages etc can live together. A community that cares about its citizens. Where will us average income earners live in the city? The pensioners on fixed incomes? The single mum working hard just to keep a roof over her head? A city full of rich workaholics like Vancouver or Toronto is not my idea of livability. I hope in 10-20 years Victoria has not lost what makes it special. At least the parks and waterfront will still be there but I want a diverse population to be able to enjoy it. more…” – Grace
“I don’t know anyone who has a problem with people who bring millions into the province, if that’s what’s actually happening. When people speculate in BC housing, it’s the other way around – we’re bringing them millions and getting nothing but rich realtors out of the deal.” – Josh
“Over the years I’ve bought many pre-sale condos at a 10 to 15% discount to similar completed comparables at the time of contract. A ‘slightly used’ car is a better value, a slight used condo is often not. (…) Right now is a very rare time when many pre-sales are at not at discount to re-sale market. Either owner-occupiers are piling in or investors are banking in appreciation? more…” – Marko Juras
“Never hurts to low ball but you have to be prepared to actually get the house. Worst thing that happens is that they say no. Ignore the real estate agent who tells you that you are going to offend the owners. I had one guy tell me that and I just fired him on the spot and got another agent to put in the offer.The offer was accepted by the way.” – Barrister

new post: https://househuntvictoria.ca/2018/12/20/slow-on-the-uptake
I doubt that you will ever hear a bull provide a time frame of when to stop buying because i all i hear is buy buy buy .. until the crash happens … remember .. the nasdaq took more than a decade to recover during the crash of early 2000’s.. .. i wonder what the perma bull says in Australia right now
You have to be in our private bear club to be in the know Patrick. 😉
I bought in 79 for $55K and no one told me I was a fool to buy, especially when it went to $100K a year and a half later when I sold just below that.
It tanked back to mid 50’s two years later and I rebought. It’s called 6th sense Patrick, there is no timeline. You really have to let go of the pompous stuff, gives the appearance you’re secretly crapping your pants.
For us it was when the risk had left the market. Took about 3 years before I was convinced of that.
Guess we won’t see many posts here tonight. Half the city has no power…
Not set on using a traditional realtor. If you know of any good flat rate realtors inParksville Qualicum could you let me know?
Your email suggestion is great way to do it if there is no alternative. Much appreciated.
javgirl55@gmail.com
I doubt that you’ll ever hear a bear provide a timeframe. Because I’ve asked here many times … what is the definable “end point” of a bearish “wait-before-buying” approach that many here are doing. No one has answered that, even if presented in simple yes/no format. For example, are you gonna wait until prices fall N% and then buy? What happens if houses rise M%, would you buy then?
I’ve concluded that there is no reasonable time frame for the bears, just a partially formed thought to “wait”
Using a traditional l realtor how successful have people been in negotiating a lower commission? I am all for realtors being fairly compensated but 7 and 3 or 3.5 is a little much.
If you are set on using a “traditional REALTOR®” call five for a “free market evaluation,” (don’t feel bad about doing this as everyone advertises it) and then just start emailing everyone back with “There are four other realtors we are comfortable with listing and we will be making our decisions on the basis of where we see the most value. Assuming a cooperating brokerage commission offering of X% what is the lowest you can offer on the gross commission %? Thank you for your time.”
Someone will budge for sure…you just can’t be dumb enough like 99% of the public which fall for really easy tactics like “If I can’t negotiate my own commission, how am I suppose to negotiate the best possible price for your home?”
The commissions people are paying in this day and age when the average Joe has access to MLS® (mere postings) is funny.
@ Deryk
With all due respect, you gotta stop cherry picking your data.
Vancouver – 1.4M List Price, 5 bedrooms with 2 bedroom legal basement suite.
https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/20088839/5-bedroom-single-family-house-231-e-king-edward-avenue-vancouver
North Vancouver – 1.4M, 4 bedrooms
https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/20087462/4-bedroom-single-family-house-2182-rufus-drive-north-vancouver
Victoria – 1.2 M Gordon Head, 4 bedrooms no suite
https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/20152931/4-bedroom-single-family-house-4364-gordon-head-rd-victoria-gordon-head
Victoria – 1.4 M, James Bay
https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/20114187/3-bedroom-single-family-house-63-boyd-st-victoria-james-bay
The way I see it, Victoria is currently way overpriced (except perhaps Langford).
Using a traditional l realtor how successful have people been in negotiating a lower commission? I am all for realtors being fairly compensated but 7 and 3 or 3.5 is a little much.
Yeah doesn’t seem to be a central place like realtor.ca for all nationwide listings. Also seems that the buyer pays the commission instead of the seller. But I’m not super familiar since we are working on a private deal.
To add to this whole Vic-Van back and forth, many older people in Van keep their SFH homes to the very end, and then move into a nursing home. Not everyone is selling and packing up to move to Vic. Take a look at the ferries today – I know people on the island that needed to go to Van today for specialized medical care appointments and had to cancel because the ferries cancelled. Things to think about before you up and move to an island.
https://theprovince.com/news/local-news/live-ferries-cancelled-as-wind-storm-hits-b-c-coast/wcm/67e58271-f115-4b6d-902a-ed35ab9f6561?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR3MXBcMiytMiEusBDj4Uv2GZACmJZ3ChZc0V3Ia3XYnNt_FA-AU0OwBErU#Echobox=1545330707
I would guess there are mixed feelings among NDP supporters. But mainly this is a blow to potential third and fourth parties. The Greens, the BC Conservatives (or whatever the current name is for the folks that think the BC Liberals are too liberal), etc.
Once this became a partisan issue it was doomed to defeat. That’s why one almost wonders if the NDP wanted it to die.
The one time that proportional representation was presented to British Columbians in a non partisan way it did quite well (57%). But as soon as it is seen as a partisan move support drops even among those that might otherwise favour a change.
Local area plans aka neighbourhood plans are also important (where they exist) as they sit between the OCP and your particular property’s zoning. They define what might happen in the future in your chosen neighbourhood with far more specificity than the OCP. Definitely check out the neighbourhood plan that applies if you are thinking about a new neighbourhood. Also if you are in City of Victoria or District of Saanich most of the plans are being updated so make your voice heard.
Victoria – https://www.victoria.ca/EN/main/residents/community-planning/neighbourhood-plans.html
Saanich – https://www.saanich.ca/EN/main/community/community-planning/local-area-plans/local-area-plan-updates.html
LOL dead quiet on here. All the Greenies head outside to kick a pipeline. 🙂
As for the second question on the proportional representation ballot, choosing between the various PR systems…. RUP, MMP, and DMP, the winner was clearly “R.I.P.”
You can hear the official announcement starting at 3:00 here https://youtu.be/-un1ADoAU-w
Now we need to get rid of the speaker and than things will start to align.. Recall on him and Eby would be real nice
Puts Weaver in his place. I am sure the NDP is trilled deep down.
Great! That ought to settle that issue.
‘No’ wins 61 per cent of the vote in proportional representation referendum, Elections BC announces
https://www.thestar.com/vancouver/2018/12/20/no-wins-61-per-cent-of-the-vote-in-proportional-representation-referendum-elections-bc-announces.html
Germany house prices are, on average, 23% higher than Canada. This is not surprising, since Canada’s house prices are 9th lowest out of 91 countries as measured by price/income ratio https://www.numbeo.com/property-investment/rankings_by_country.jsp
In addition, as described in the previous posts, certain property types are not as readily available in Germany, such as a big house on large lots on water. We had visitors from Germany tell us the same thing as dasmo heard.
There are virtually no SFH homes in Manhattan, so the price of one of those would be huge, if available in a nice area.
No on the referendum. Too bad green LOL. Not even close
Josh – yes! I agree – that’s the point, LOL
Same goes for 1978. That was 2-3 cycles ago.
@Tomato,
The CPI is not really something to live by. Too much substitution and manipulation. If you want proof just look at long term house prices, or equities.
If you’re talking to me, that was the point I was making in response to Deryk. Referring to a cost of a home at an earlier point in time (in his case, 1978), over a long enough time span, is indeed pointless. I just made it more extreme to illustrate the issue…
“It’s actually the opposite. We know that in even the worst declines, home prices drop perhaps 1-3% per month. So a 7% or 10% decline in prices in one month can very confidently be classified as not reflective of the underlying market since we know the real change must lie within a smaller range.”
Let me be more specific. What I am saying is that a 7.6% decline has a low probability to happen in a healthy market (less than 5% probability). Therefore, maybe the market is not healthy, a hypothesis that would better explain such a decline.
It’s the easiest thing in the world to say that you’re a long-term bull on RE. If the term is long enough, everything goes up (herp derp, no shit sherlock, etc etc). Everyone is a long-term bull on RE unless they’re some kind of apocalypse nut job. When people express doubts about gains in RE locally, what exactly is the point about bringing up what property cost in 1918? That’s so utterly out of context and pointless. The bear vs bull discussion here has a reasonable timeframe – when you talk about things so far outside that timeframe, you’re not writing anything worth reading.
Good news for the planet. Keep the fossil fuel project cancellations coming!
I also saw this today:

@guest_53671
How?
Using 2% inflation I get 1$ being worth 80 cents after 10 years
Plans for a 25 Billion dollar LNG plant in Prince Rupert BC have just been shelved…
https://business.financialpost.com/commodities/energy/exxon-mobil-withdraws-application-to-approve-25-billion-b-c-lng-project
@ Dasmo
He explains more:
…
“Knowing what city defined neighbourhood you live in can be important as it might affect what rules apply to development (for instance in local area plans)”
You should always look up the zoning and the Official Community Plan for a property irregardless what neighborhood you think you may live in. As the zoning in your neighborhood for individual properties may be different. Some people may think that because they live in Fernwood they are duplex zoned. That may or may not be true as it is also dependent on other characteristics about the property such as frontage and site area and sometimes the age of the house.
If you want to know about zoning then you would refer to the city’s planning department.
As I said it is about being consistent. When you ask an agent about homes in a neighborhood they don’t look at the zoning bylaw boundaries to find homes in that neighborhood they use the real estate board’s definitions.
Since this blog is concerned about real estate prices and homes then I would say that using the VREB’s neighborhood definitions would be the most appropriate. Which is the neighborhood that is identified on all listings.
The rule of 72 is too complicated. Just remember that money loses half it’s value every ten years….
@ patriotz
To work out a rental yield, the weekly rent X 52 weeks, is divided by the purchase price.
He’s ignoring the rental yield of the property. And this is supposedly Canada’s best known financial guru.
HA. Is it true they don’t really have an MLS like service there?
The system we have here in insane compared to a lot of countries. I looked at purchasing a brokerage in Croatia and after all my due diligence I wouldn’t touch the market with a 10-foot pole.
No exclusivity on listings so sellers list with 10+ brokerages which means no one has a strong incentive to do floorplans, photos, or anything for that matter.
No MLS system so really only form of advertising is along the lines of websites like usedvictoria.com, Kijiji, Craigslist, and brokerage listings on their website. You have to hit up 10-20 websites to find most of the inventory.
As a result of no MLS system you also don’t have a reliable guide on pricing.
No standard template contracts so both parties hire a lawyer to help with the drafting and the bank and forth….lawyers must love this!
99% of transactions are “double-ended.” Buyer has no agent.
No lockboxes.
Docusign not accepted and most people aren’t packing scanners at home.
Very few clean titles. In a region like Dalmation sometimes you have families that moved to countries like Chile after WWI (one) and then you have like 50 people you need to chase down in foreign countries to clean up the title.
VERY FEW sellers will give you keys to the property (culturual? as not that many scams going around). So every showing you meet the unrepresented buyer and the seller. Sounds fun with the seller hanging out during the showing.
A good percentage of sellers will question the commission once the property sells. Like they will ask for a statement of expenses. Here property sells in 2 hrs, commission is 40k and you don’t hear a beep from anyone 🙂
A ton of buyers will try to circumnavigate the listing agent and go directly to the seller by knocking on the door. Most bigger brokerages don’t put the address on the website but they text you the address the day of the showing.
I ended up with something like 32 negative points compared to here.
Gross commission is about +/- 2.5%, no coop.
One brokerage I looked at had a “managing broker,” four agents, office space, two brokerage cars and their GROSS for the year was $84,000 Euros.
@ Deryk Houston
I’m gonna quote from the book “The Wealthy Barber Returns” And the Magic and realization of “The Rule of 72”
Salaries are similar to here but in euros, so approximately similar affordability ratios (but ownership rate much lower there).
Have lots of extended family in Germany as it is a hotspot for Croats and don’t think salaries are 55% higher adjusted for currency conversion.
HA. Is it true they don’t really have an MLS like service there? I heard there was funny business around buying and selling anyway from some friends that lived in Berlin for a bit. They said renting was brutal too. (had to give an entire years rent in cash). But, they were foreigners so….
Super fun…..
By whom exactly? House prices had been flat for a couple of years (with real price declines due to high inflation). According to my data the benchmark price of a detached house was a bit under $100k.
Sounds like another variation on the old “permabear” argument. No not everyone who thinks RE is overpriced now thought it was overpriced then.
The old proverb: “Home is where the trebuchet can reach.”
My backyard trebuchet can almost launch rocks into Oak Bay. For that reason I consider myself an Oak Bay resident.
You could heighten the dramatic effect by seeing what your Kerrisdale lot sold for 1 hundred years ago. You could compare your nominal income against that hypothetical person who bought your lot in 1918. So? I could say your net worth in RE took a pounding in 1981, 1990, and to a lesser extent, 2008. I could also say you’ve known almost nothing but declining rates since the early 80’s.
What you’re saying is it’s good to buy and hold. And that is usually true. But the point is not to say, “at no point will the nominal or real value ever go up again”, rather at certain moments along the market cycle there are better times to buy than others. Ignoring the market around you when purchasing RE is not necessarily a good idea, especially if you’re just getting in.
As it stands, the data and market activity suggests a correction is unfolding and people are stretching dangerously to buy in now. If we were having this conversation 37 years ago, I would tell you, it’s not a good time to buy. And I would have been correct – you would have, in that moment, lost over 40% of your money in real terms.
Today you can simply retort by saying, but I held it for decades, so it recovered and look at it now. Then I say, yes, but have a look at all of that in the context of the 1st paragraph. So I would agree that anyone buying now, had better be prepared to hold it for a long time. Over enough time it would likely be a wash, it just depends how burdensome the debt repayments would be in the interim. That last part, is the real issue that I sense you’re not apprehending here.
Anyways, no one’s trying to “win” here as you put it, so don’t worry about it. Just pointing out, it’s simplistic to say, “It was 50k in 1978 and people thought I was an idiot then too”.
So on this logic, I live in Royal Oak… Since I can through a rock over my neighbours back yard and the road in front of their house to hit it.
According to the city of Victoria the boundary between Fernwood and Oaklands runs along Haultain. There is a lot of consistency but some inconsistencies between VREB defined neighbourhoods and municipally defined neighbourhoods in City of Victoria.
Knowing what city defined neighbourhood you live in can be important as it might affect what rules apply to development (for instance in local area plans)
Victoria Map – https://www.victoria.ca/assets/Departments/Planning~Development/Maps/neighbourhoods-map.pdf
VREB map – https://www.vreb.org/buying-selling/about-victoria-bc/the-vreb-core-region/victoria
PS: I am a bit sad that Colwood no longer has the VREB defined “neighbourhood” of “Gravel Pit” (now Royal Bay). Would have been cool to be able to say you live in “Gravel Pit”.
I’m sticking with 20 million Leo!
What is it like trying to sell a property in Germany from here?
Deryk you sound similar to my mom when I’m arguing about RE. She laughs and says “Daughter” if you had bought a house 3 years ago we wouldn’t be having this conversation. But the reality is I wasn’t in a position to buy a house then so it’s a non-argument IMO. Yes if I could go back in time I would maybe try to find a way to buy a house but it just didn’t happen for me. My point is you can look back and say yes a kerrisdale house for 50k was a great investment but do you still own it? Why not keep it forever as an investment? Because other factors are at play right? I fully agree with you that as a person who can “afford” a SFH right now that if I were to buy one right now and then 40 years later look back it would look like a good investment. But I have to be able to afford that house now and live in it! Also the house I can afford to own is a bit junky and am on the verge of something nicer so why not wait to find something good for my money? I’m not trying to argue with you (as I do sort of agree with you as well) just some expensive Canadian food for thought.
Deryk Houston: I have no idea where house prices will be down the road but I would be happy to buy you a beer and listen to your view on things. I am still waiting for my wife to decide if we are staying or going at this point. As one can tell I am pretty indifferent to it.
“As an example, I’ve never heard anyone say they live in Arbutus.”
The real estate board from time to time will re-define the boundaries of areas to better reflect the changing neighborhoods. If you’re a long time resident of Gordon Head you are not likely to change. But new residents that are buying homes on small lots say in Christmas Hill identify their area differently. The same with those that live in Oaklands the newer residents north of Bay Street no longer identify themselves as living in Fernwood but the older residents still call it Fernwood. Another example is the area around Hillside Mall it used to be called Sears. Sears is gone and so is the name.
Several years ago the Gordon Head neighborhood was broken into Gordon Head and Lambrick Park as it was too big of a geographical area. Now when someone says they live in Lambrick Park you know they live near Lambirck school and Home Depot. When they say Arbutus you know which side of Gordon Head Road they live on. Even when it comes to values one knows that the Arbutus neighborhood has more in common with Cadboro Bay than it does with Lambrick Park.
I don’t see any harm when someone still identifies themselves as living in Gordon Head when they live near UVIC, I know what they mean but a good attorney would use that inaccuracy to discredit an appraisal in court as the appraiser has not kept up with changes. It’s just a matter of being consistent in your data sources and up to date with recent changes.
But for the ordinary Joe and Jane you can still call Arbutus as Gordon Head and Saanich as Victoria when someone asks you where you live.
Another Old house for sale in Kitsilano for price comparisons to Victoria where prices are very inexpensive.
https://www.viewvancouverhomesforsale.com/homes/bc/vancouver/vancouvresdr2253128262274755/3077-w-16th-avenue-vancouver-bc-v6k%203c8
I firmly believe that it is not unreasonable to believe that living next door to a city with those kinds of prices for homes will not have some sort of roll over effect here in Victoria. That’s why I still recommend buying a sfh house in Victoria and for people to ignore the voices that are saying Victoria is overpriced. No one is going to win this argument today. Talk to me in one years time and then you can point out that I got it wrong.
I have lived for a long time and all my life I have had people pull out their dusty old charts and graphs and rant on about why I am wrong. When we bought our first house in Kerrisdale in Vancouver for $50,000.00 in 1978 ……. we were called idiots then too.
But I do respect everyone’s opinion. I just don’t have to agree:)
No way. Maybe in Berlin but that’s just because that kind of property doesn’t exist there. And that’s a city of 3.5M.
In a more comparable location it would likely cost about the same in euros.
Working on selling an older house in a good location near Munich right now…. Appraised 700,000 euros. Salaries are similar to here but in euros, so approximately similar affordability ratios (but ownership rate much lower there).
It’s actually the opposite. We know that in even the worst declines, home prices drop perhaps 1-3% per month. So a 7% or 10% decline in prices in one month can very confidently be classified as not reflective of the underlying market since we know the real change must lie within a smaller range.
Only comparisons to Australia and the United States are valid, sorry.
We have been hosting Workaway people at our house from around the world. It’s not only helping to finish the house but we also talk about housing sometimes. We were chatting last night to our latest couple from Berlin. They were noting how expensive it is here.
For food.
Housing on the other hand they were saying was extremely cheap. They were describing some pretty insane rent prices and house prices. My house would be worth 20 million in Germany apparently!
If you don’t think either markets are overpriced, then I would be inclined to think that there’s effectively no upper limit to what you would consider to be overpriced.
People in Vancouver were (and in some cases, still are) arguing the same thing – house prices in Vancouver aren’t that expensive compared to Hong Kong.
I don’t think it’s a good argument for several reasons, but the most basic one is:
If the police stop me for driving in a school zone at 100km/h where the speed limit is 30km/h, I don’t think it’s logical to defend it by telling the officer that other people normally drive through the area at 150km/h – therefore, my speed is comparatively reasonable.
I suppose it’s literally true (I mean, it is cheaper here, isn’t it?), but it remains indefensible and actually misses the forest for the trees.
“enjoy the lifelong income potential”
At a cap rate of 1.6%, it is funny how the sellers in Vancouver still go through the motions as if prices had anything to do with fundamentals like rental income.
The interesting thing here, is that this is happening depsite the fact that we’re still running negative interest rates in real terms, have the lowest unemployment in decades, and above average wage growth.
Shows you how sensitive and overbought the economy is now. 25 basis points is a bit of a joke – try telling someone 20 years ago that that kind of hike might push people over the edge. Different times!
Stupid article about 2 stupid people. Gee we are massively in debt but lets send our kids to private school.
‘The water’s starting to rise’: Insolvency business booms in Canada amid rate hikes
People who make a living guiding others through bankruptcy in Canada say they’ve never been busier.
Record debt burdens, rising borrowing costs and, in some cases, bigger payday loans are driving many Canadians to seek relief, according to several licensed insolvency trustees who spoke to Bloomberg. They say November was their busiest on record, and December — typically a slow time of year in the insolvency trade — hasn’t let up.
“I’m essentially trying to add capacity every day to get people seen,” Blair Mantin, a Vancouver-based licensed insolvency trustee at Sands & Associates, said by phone. “Usually things slow down around Christmas, but we haven’t seen the demand slow down this year.”
“The tide has turned, and the water’s starting to rise,” Ted Michalos, a licensed insolvency trustee at Hoyes, Michalos & Associates Inc., said in a phone interview. “Now it’s just a question of how quickly does it rise.”
https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/the-water-s-starting-to-rise-insolvency-business-booms-in-canada-amid-rate-hikes-1.1186351
Haha, so true.
You’re like the Trumpers saying there’s no sign of collusion or obstruction while many go to jail and court. It’s actually 5.3%.
BlackRock sees ‘prolonged’ slump in Australia’s housing market
[SYDNEY] Australia’s housing slump could go on for another 12 to 18 months as banks maintain tighter credit standards and prices slide amid an oversupply, according to the world’s biggest asset manager.
National home prices could fall another 10 per cent and the decline will increasingly hit consumer confidence in 2019, said BlackRock Inc’s Craig Vardy, head of fixed income for Australia. Values across the nation’s capital cities dropped 5.3 per cent in the year through November, according to data from CoreLogic Inc.
https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/real-estate/blackrock-sees-%E2%80%98prolonged%E2%80%99%C2%A0slump-in-australias-housing-market
Noticed a big pop with 10 new bankruptcies this past week. When insolvency doesn’t work you know there’s major trouble ahead.
Higher interest rates pushing more Canadians to seek debt relief as business booms for insolvency trustees
Record debt burdens, rising borrowing costs and, in some cases, bigger payday loans are driving many Canadians to insolvency
https://business.financialpost.com/personal-finance/debt/business-booms-for-insolvency-trustees-amid-higher-canada-rates
What is “truly stunning”, is you describing what is going on with Australia house prices as “carnage”. Fact is Australia house prices are down 1-3% on the year. Yawn.
https://www.businessinsider.com.au/australia-property-market-house-prices-sydney-melbourne-corelogic-2018-10
“House prices fell by 3.1% over the year in weighted terms, again faster than units which declined by a smaller 1.3%. However, while prices have now fallen for 12 consecutive months — longer than the average housing market downturn in Australia seen in the past — Lawless says the pace of declines are still modest at this point.
“[This is] hardly a crash, and a slower rate of decline relative to the previous housing market downturn between June 2010 to February 2012 when national dwelling values fell by 3.0% over the first twelve months, declining 6.5% from peak to trough,” he said.”
I would, because it sounds much better. However, I would likely have to explain that it was near Gordon Head, so that kind of defeats the purpose.
LF – that is just financial porn. It exists so people can read it and feel smug that they aren’t that stupid.
Sorry to interrupt your narrative but folks with 60,000 of credit card debt are not the norm here, there or anywhere. Folks with 60K credit card debt who also send their kids to expensive private school are probably about 5 standard deviations from the norm.
Debt larger than what they have ($570K)would be quite manageable on their stated income ($170K) if (a) it was mortgage debt not credit card debt, (b) they lived within their means.
I’m not sure why @ Andy would compare a house in Horseshoe Bay with a house in Kitsilano. The reason the house in Horseshoe Bay is only $1.4 million is because it is so far from downtown Vancouver. My point was to look at a house relatively close to downtown Vancouver with a house relatively close to downtown Victoria.
In Vancouver’s Kitsilano area, a much sought after area, the price is easily $2.5 – 3million dollars plus for a modest house. In Victoria, in a much sought after area such as Fairfield etc, the price is around $1 million plus. The price difference is massive and yet people in Victoria still think houses here are over priced.
Speaking of truly stunning – after watching the RE carnage beginning to unfold in Australia, their regulator has just okayed banks to start reissuing interest only mortgages again. Effective January.
What the heck are they thinking? First they say they are willing to drop rates and aggressively print even more money to “stimulate the economy”, and now this?
I have said before that Australia’s housing market is certifiably insane. Now it’s clear that’s not the only thing. I will be very curious to see what happens.
In markets, the trends are like travelling up, then down, a mountain. Momentum begets more momentum, and once it’s established, it’s very hard to stop until it’s actually run its course. We saw this here with the, “I can’t believe the housing market is still going with everything we’ve thrown at it” theme.
But that’s how it works, and the reverse is just as true. So what will this policy move do? I suspect their measures won’t work…but hmmm.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/dec/19/bank-watchdog-lifts-restrictions-on-interest-only-loans-as-house-prices-fall
Here’s an interesting read. This chronicles an American couple with a few kids, and they are drowning in debt. Funny thing is, they are in far less debt than people here in BC are taking on.
Just reading about their lives and the choices they make – it truly is stunning that people do this, live like this, and do it again and again.
https://www.wealthsimple.com/en-ca/magazine/money-diary-couple-debt
I am seeing more out there too. More variety, decent(er) houses taking their time to sell and some good “deals” for someone compared to a year ago. Even during the slow time of year! I don’t think the data truly shows these peaks of 2016/17 because they didn’t last very long. You have to think the buyers who continuously lost out on houses during that time are now buying that house they couldn’t get before.
I agree about the neighborhoods. You see the good neighborhoods become out of reach for the average dual incomers so they settle for a lesser neighborhood and that goes on and on until people are thinking shawnigan and Mill Bay look like nice places to commute from (sacrifices right?). That process takes time and we can see how hot Sidney got (well after Victoria) and how it doesn’t seem to be so hot anymore. Just like that!
To most people, in everyday conversation, Gordon Head means the whole big neighbourhood that Saanich defines as Gordon Head. Whereas the VREB breaks down Gordon Head into four subareas: Mt Doug, Lambrick Park, Arbutus, and (confusingly) Gordon Head.
As an example, I’ve never heard anyone say they live in Arbutus.
Since we all rely on data from the Victoria Real Estate Board, it would make sense to use the maps from their web site.
God, I hate to nitpick again, but Campus View Elementary is not in GH either.
[hides under the table]
Listen up, everyone! No more comments on anything unless you have direct and frequent experience on the subject matter. Perfectly reasonable!
My definition? Based on Saanich’s definition of GH, Campus View Elementary isn’t in GH (GH ends at McKenzie Ave):

https://www.saanich.ca/EN/main/community/community-planning/local-area-plans.html
However, if you live in the south part of GH your catchment elementary school is Campus View:

https://www.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=64f803769c7c435185bcb72989268d0e
I’m starting to see this too. Not many compared to a historically nominal market, but more than before. Just lurking for now. Can’t say it’s never tempting, but I still don’t think the market psychology is where it needs to be for me to feel confident that present valuations are going to stick.
My advice is to not panic. There has been quite a bit of FOMO over these last couple years and I think people overpaid for properties that they otherwise wouldn’t have purchased. You have the luxury of time in that you can make a decision that is right for you. I nearly purchased on a busy street and I’m thankful every time I pass by there that I didn’t. There is a selection of homes available now (even the dated & odd ones) with many positive qualities that were too hard to find before.
Based on her definition, i don’t even think Campus View is in Gordon Head.
Again, I do it, I know what it’s like. You do not, so why are you commenting on it when you actually have no clue?
Why would anyone take anything you say to heart when you make comments in which you admittedly have no idea what you’re talking about?
So these “desirable” neighborhoods in Victoria are now selling for prices seen a year and half ago. This means that some of the “undesirable” neighborhoods has seen their price increase much more than the 5.4% and 10.1% in the past two years to arrive at those overall regional increases.
If this true then it inherently makes me very nervous about buying a home currently, especially one in an “undesirable” neighborhood. Instead of “financially well off” folks driving up average home prices, now it has turned into “financially stretched” folks driving up average home prices.
I can hit a golf ball from that house to Campus View Elementary School so I would consider it GH. I think your nit picking on technicality here and doing so on purpose. Please save that for your online battles with Hawk.
@ Deryk
Meanwhile, this house in West Van with a legal suite and listed for 1.5M, nice interior, in a great neighborhood, safe, ocean a couple blocks away, good schools sat on the market for ages, unable to sell and was eventually cancelled.
https://www.zolo.ca/west-vancouver-real-estate/6780-marine-drive?sc=aw-1016539634-52921574314&gclid=CjwKCAiA9efgBRAYEiwAUT-jtGRIFfDQxB65tfhLXl7ONcpOZQe2c-xTrTkxPJKUmVMI13Wj_JI2iBoCsk8QAvD_BwE
I haven’t looked at all your examples, and some have oddball characteristics or are at least “dated”, which is often what is left on the market at this time of year.
In general, the impression I have from the listings and sales updates I continue to watch is that prices in the areas you selected have not gone up this year, have possibly dropped from last year, but have not gone as low as 2016.
There are now houses coming up in my updates that instantly pique my interest, which means that they are now triggering “on sale” in my brain. This started to happen a few months ago, for the first time since we bought our house in 2016. At that point, I guess I shifted to being bearish. However, I have learned that might not mean much for a price decline in Victoria.
ks112, just so you know, this isn’t in GH.
Interesting list. Some of these homes I know – not so much having gone through but I know the neighborhood and what similar homes sold for. So I’ll jump in with my thoughts.
Homes didn’t come up often in this area but when they did – it seemed to always be well over asking. A 2016 asking of $765k? It would have gone much higher and probably in the mid-800’s even given it’s dated interior.
Cordova Bay Rd is an odd one just as home in the Falaise area are. Some sell high, some low, some who knows? I’d say you’re estimates for pricing are about right given the location of this particular one. Not the greatest of lots and pretty snug up to a noisy road.
That’s been a well-loved area these last few years. I’m shocked that this one hasn’t sold yet (but yet not as everything has slowed to a crawl here). This home sold in 2016 for $868,000 so your estimate is not far off.
I think there are too much what ifs and that in the discussion on house prices, lets get back to evidence and facts.
I have below a sample of 8 homes currently on the MLS in two so called “desirable neighborhoods”: Gordon head and Broadmead/Royal Oak between $750k and $1M. I have taken the average of the Year over Year price changes for Sept, Oct and Nov for 2018 (5.4%) and 2017 (10.1%) to come up with an indicative of what these homes would be asking/ worth if they were listed this time last year and this time in 2016.
So assuming these homes are currently fairly priced (which is very conservative since since some of these have been on the market for quite awhile), is it probable that these homes would have sold at the indicative 2017 and 2016 prices I had calculated for those respective years? If the answer is: they would have sold for more in 2017 and 2016 than what is calculated, then it means those Year over Year increases quoted by the VREB is understating the correction currently seen in those neighborhoods. Vice versa if the opposite true. I am especially curious to hear the opinions of those whom have been watching the market for a long time.
Gordon Head:
MLS® Number: 397966
https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/19854504/5-bedroom-single-family-house-1759-mortimer-st-victoria-mt-tolmie
(Current List Price – $769,900), (2017 Price – $728,325), (2016 Price – $654,765)
MLS® Number: 401451
https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/20089460/6-bedroom-single-family-house-1824-feltham-rd-victoria-lambrick-park
(Current List Price – $835,500), (2017 Price – $789,910), (2016 Price – $710,129)
MLS® Number: 400569
https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/20004371/4-bedroom-single-family-house-1770-ash-rd-victoria-gordon-head
(Current List Price – $899,000), (2017 Price – $850,454), (2016 Price – $764,558)
MLS® Number: 401677
https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/20112715/3-bedroom-single-family-house-1603-hawthorne-st-victoria-gordon-head
(Current List Price – $748,000), (2017 Price – $707,658), (2016 Price – $636,140)
Broadmead/Cordova Bay:
MLS® Number: 401238
https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/20068529/3-bedroom-single-family-house-4493-emily-carr-dr-victoria-broadmead
(Current List Price – $899,900), (2017 Price – $851,305), (2016 Price – $765,324)
MLS® Number: 402258
https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/20166022/4-bedroom-single-family-house-4878-cordova-bay-rd-victoria-cordova-bay
(Current List Price – $875,000), (2017 Price – $827,750), (2016 Price – $744,147)
MLS® Number: 401745
https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/20118852/5-bedroom-single-family-house-926-falaise-cres-victoria-broadmead
(Current List Price – $888,888), (2017 Price – $840,888), (2016 Price – $755,958)
MLS® Number: 400893
https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/20034459/4-bedroom-single-family-house-1005-kentwood-pl-victoria-broadmead
(Current List Price – $999,999), (2017 Price – $945,054), (2016 Price – $849,604)
Smart money dumping ASAP.
gwac, guess you never heard of risk premiums in a late bull market credit cycle. Rates aren’t going down in any big way until disaster hits bottom and that’s a very long way to go from here.
Numbers tell a different story when everyone is in the same global pool of credit money. They will want more in a high risk environment like a bookie does when the odds go against him.
I thought that credit guy said it was supposed to be a “mild recession” ?
“Jarring” FedEx Outlook Cut Suggests “Severe Global Recession”
Needless to say, with little in terms of warning, Morgan Stanley was shocked by the magnitude and severity of the cut, and suggested that this implies a “severe global recession” is unfolding:
“We recognize that global growth has slowed but we are very surprised by the magnitude of the headwind, which is what might be seen in a severe recession,” Shanker wrote. “We believe global growth concerns are also likely to get worse before they get better next year, which could mean more of a drag on FY20 EPS.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-12-19/jarring-fedex-outlook-cut-suggests-severe-global-recession?
Townhome in Rockland today for $1,550,000…purchased in 2015 for $1,050,000.
“Here is a house for sale in Vancouver… for those who think Victoria is expensive. https://www.remax.ca/bc/vancouver-real-estate/2696-w-11th-avenue-wp_id226950742-lst
The house shown is not at all unusual. It’s what it costs in Vancouver today in a what they call a down market.”
This is not what an average home costs in Vancouver. For some reason you think the west end is metro Vancouver. It is a small portion of it. You would be comparing it to Oak Bay where many of them would likely purchase in. They are unlikely buying homes in Sooke or Langford and driving up prices there. Vancouver residents were buying here in large numbers in 2016 for the simple fact that prices were at a high there and much lower here. Those buyers have substantially decreased since 2016 simply because our prices are now much more expensive. Many of those west end buyers have already left or are wealthy foreign owners who bought there to live the Vancouver lifestyle. I think you are also connecting your love of Victoria over Vancouver to how you think every other Vancouver resident feels. This is not the case of anyone of my family members and friends who live in Vancouver and the Fraser Valley who have never considered a move here. Victoria is great but there is no way to get around the fact that the ferries here are a major obstacle. Just simple things like having the freedom to take a quick weekend road trip to Washington State or other towns around BC without having to worry about ferry hassle like we do is something most Vancouver residents have never had to consider and would want to avoid. There are many cheaper options for Vancouver residents . You can drive just a little over an hour from Vancouver and buy a home for example in a city like Chilliwack for 500k or other areas of the Fraser Valley for about the same price as Victoria. This is no different from the people who move from here to places like Parksville or Campbell River and can still be close enough to family, friends, and Victoria. Take a look at Leos chart in the link of lower mainland buyers which is steadily decreasing and which is likely to continue as sales and prices fall in Vancouver
https://househuntvictoria.ca/2018/07/06/whats-going-on-with-prices/
Roll-over was starting well before B20. Aggravating factor, not the factor.
It does hawk when you claim 5 years are going higher because the fed raised rates.
Patrick.
You forget that fewer qualifiers lower prices as listings will eventually increase, especially without the speculators who have pulled out and won’t be back til at least 20% cheaper, for starters that is. Economics 101 stuff.
Warren Buffett bails on Canadian mortgage market. Home Capital tanks 15%. Yep, it’s all sunshine bulls, I assume you’re all loading up?
In other words we milked you for our bucks but this is way too high risk with the housing market leaking major gas.
Home Capital shares sink as Buffett to ‘substantially exit’ investment
“Berkshire’s investment in Home is now not of a size to justify our ongoing involvement. Although we have decided to substantially exit from our investment, we will continue to cheer from the sidelines for our friends at Home.”
https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/home-capital-shares-sink-as-buffett-to-substantially-exit-investment-1.1185714
Pumpers making extreme statements, not a good sign at all.
But for those who do qualify, they qualify for higher amounts, a factor pushing prices up. In other words, the reverse of the price drops you tell us happen with rising rates.
The bears think that house will eventually drop to $500K, because of income-based affordability, HELOCs, interest rates, whatever.
I wonder what kind of woman in a bar Wolf thinks Kitsilano is. The houses there are dreary. I can’t see why the area is desirable.
Doesn’t mean shit when you can’t qualify at 2 points higher. Credit squeezes force out buyers gwac, no matter what the rates. Just some more “facts” for you.
More lies by the desperate pumpers about to lose all the fantasy money.
Just like a “soft landing” which has never happened in history. Also written by the credit union, the first financial institutions to go under in a crash.
:large


Here is a house for sale in Vancouver… for those who think Victoria is expensive. https://www.remax.ca/bc/vancouver-real-estate/2696-w-11th-avenue-wp_id226950742-lst
The house shown is not at all unusual. It’s what it costs in Vancouver today in a what they call a down market.
Smart money doesn’t hop into and out of homeownership at all.
I’m not so sure they’re going to be in an overall down trend from here. The path is a strong upward trend on a 3 year series, though it has fallen since October. The hike down south is going to put pressure up here at some point, immediate or not.
Poloz is really in an impossible situation, IMO.
Great Intro you started it again the bears are going to say no one is coming here to retire.
‘Mild recession’ in housing market to continue in B.C. in 2019: report
B.C.’s housing market is in a “mild recession” but Vancouver Island’s real estate market is generally stable, a new report from Central 1 Credit Union says.
“I think the market in Victoria and the rest of the Island is still quite solid,” Bryan Yu, Central 1’s deputy chief economist, said Tuesday.
“But prices have essentially flat-lined” on the Island, Yu said.
However, prices are expected to rise in Island communities that are attracting retirees, he said.
https://www.timescolonist.com/real-estate/mild-recession-in-housing-market-to-continue-in-b-c-in-2019-report-1.23546285
Good news in the short-term for mortgage holders.
This just in for some real news and facts. Canadian 5 year bond rates are at 1.94 from a high of 2.5 a month ago so the reality is 5 year rates should be coming down and help with the stress test.
I think you meant people who speculate and missed the up market and than spend their days hoping for a crash rent in this market.
Fed raises US interest rates, at least 2 more coming next year. That’s another 3/4 of a point onto the 5 year mortgage and stress test.
You forgot drug dealers…. then again I have retired doctors, government workers, highly paid nurses, tech workers, as well as university professors making $150K living in my building. Smart money rents in this market.
You’re fixated on that, aren’t you? Does it make it any less bikable if I don’t personally do it daily?
I feel fortunate—only doctors, lawyers, engineers, and government workers can afford to buy in much of Gordon Head, but I did it with a useless English degree.
You forgot to mention the the 70’s decor in need of a $100K plus reno and worth $100K below assessment. Must be the worst dump on the block.
You know the pumpers are having a tough time accepting the biggest bubble in history is beginning its multi year decline when they have to resort to spelling mistakes.
Oh, so Soper fabricated that “20% foreign buyers in Gordon Head in one month” thing. Noted.
Sort of, except for lot sizes and overall neighbourhood planning.
Yes. This is what I’m trying to get at.
The GH box is not why GH is desirable. And, to be clear, I’m not arguing that GH alone is special; there are several areas in the core that have most or all of the positive characteristics of GH, and that’s why they are very desirable too (and, by the way, prices reflect that).
When your argument has no merit, then criticize their spelling.
Still haven’t answered how many times you’ve biked downtown.
You continue to say desperate. What makes me desperate exactly? I don’t have to live with people below me just to afford the place I’m living in like you.
Canada’s annual inflation rate drops sharply on lower gas prices
Lower gas prices pulled Canada’s annual inflation rate in November down to 1.7 percent, the first time in 10 months it has been below the Bank of Canada’s 2.0 percent target, underscoring market expectations that imminent interest rate hikes are off the table.
The Bank of Canada, which has raised rates five times since July 2017 as the economy strengthened, said earlier this month that economic data heading into the fourth quarter had been weaker than expected.
“There’s absolutely no rush for the bank and probably the earliest we’re going to hear from them is in the springtime, in terms of rate hikes,” said Doug Porter, chief economist at BMO Capital Markets.
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/canadas-annual-inflation-rate-drops-134436946.html
“That said, one month still doesn’t mean anything. SF Median price dropped 10% in Dec 2015. Right before the explosion upwards. Need at least 3 months”
Yes, it might not mean anything. The chance of that though is less than 5% (if the standard deviation of change is 3-4%).
I was referring to the seasonality being noise not the Nov drop.
That said, one month still doesn’t mean anything. SF Median price dropped 10% in Dec 2015. Right before the explosion upwards. Need at least 3 months
Heh. Warren Buffet just bailed on Home Capital Inc.
Getting the jitters, perhaps.
@Leo S.
“Yeah I don’t see a lot of seasonality in the median prices. Even 10 year averages are all over the place. Maybe some more price gains in Feb/Mar but standard deviation on all of these is 3-4% so likely just noise.”
Well, a drop of 7.6 is double the standard deviation. That’s quite unlikely to be noise. Such a big change has less than 5% chance to be noise, at least if we consider the normal distribution (see: 68–95–99.7 rule on Wikipedia).
Not beyond their ability at all. The problem is that any truly effective policies to discourage foreigners from parking money in RE would have to apply to local owners as well. It’s the latter who are the real obstacle.
@Wolf
I’ve never heard a neighbourhood described like that; I appreciate your vivid imagery. I can see your point, and in many other cities, it would be accurate, but most of Gordon Head is located near Mt. Doug, or the ocean, or at least some park. If you can look past the houses, most of the lots are quite nice, and the houses will eventually get torn down for nicer ones. I am biased, though, because I am now a…? What do you call someone who lives in Gordon Head?
Can you give a similar-styled description of a neighbourhood you think is great, for comparison?
I am curious about MLS#:397552.
50s boxes in Esquimalt
Status:Pending
DoM122
Assessed Value:$1,093,500
Price Original$1,799,899
Price Sold$1,690,000
The seller able to wait out for a buyer that matched his price, and who will buy this place?
My wife rides downtown from our place in Gordon Head most days. Lochside connector, about 35 min. But as several men on the trail have pointed out when she blasts past them she is a “strong woman”.
None taken. I do find it amusing that Introvert hates Langford developments with a passion, but Gordon Head is simply Langford from 40 years ago.
Not by neighbourhood, only by municipality.

What you are describing sounds very much like what New Coast Realty got in trouble for. Basically taking advantage of elderly sellers and buying under market with questionable tactics.
What can you do? Well you can sue, and/or you can complain to council https://www.recbc.ca/complaints/complaint.html
A losing proposition. In the end it is their business. However if you did find out that it was bought significantly below market you can complain to council anyway and they might investigate.
@Deryk
It’s really not a huge difference anymore if you’re comparing apples to apples (Ie West Van to Uplands). Even up island the prices have gone up so much that it’s not a great deal anymore, like it was just 2 years ago.
Yes. I want to make some tweaks to the measure to filter out the crazy properties (new builds with no assessed value, and the oddballs that are entered with assessments of $100 that throw off the ratios.
What are you looking for in this chart?
Good idea. Of course you would have to discount the current sale/ask ratio. Right now the ask/assessment ratio would definitely be higher than the sale/assessed ratio.
Many of them did. That was more of the story in 2016 though. Since then Victoria prices are up and Vancouver is down so the differential has shrunk. Predictably Vancouver buyers are also down in response. Still more than there were 5 years ago though.
Will Victoria drop in response to Vancouver? Hard to tell because Vancouver has been so irrational for so long, it’s hard to tell if on the way down it what irrational turn it will take. With a lot of undocumented money flowing around, you can’t really make any predictions. Will the government manage to stamp out the shadow money and bring it back to fundamentals or is that problem way beyond their ability to address?
We definitely do get overflow from Vancouver, and that is a wildcard for sure.
Yeah I don’t see a lot of seasonality in the median prices. Even 10 year averages are all over the place. Maybe some more price gains in Feb/Mar but standard deviation on all of these is 3-4% so likely just noise.
@ Intovert
Vancouver’s been turning over since what, 2016 or so? Victoria’s just recently turned over. We won’t know what Victoria’s downs are going to look like, likely for at least another year or longer…
“That would be “peddle,” genius. And what I’ve been “peddling” has so far panned out. What you and the other desperate renters have been peddling for the last 11 years has not.”
At least that English degree is good for something.
Welcome to my world! 🙂
You’d have to go quite slow to take 45 minutes. Especially on the way in. Tyndall Park to the legislature via the Lochside is <35 minutes bike if you are in reasonable shape. Even Google Maps says 38 minutes and their bike times are very easy to beat.
Also if you halfway enjoy biking, cycling from Gordon head to downtown on the Lochside is a lovely commute. Long enough to maintain fitness. Short enough that it is not an epic hurdle.
<
blockquote>
Pretty sure Hawk called you a d-bag once. I would say he was pretty spot on with that one.
So much certitude from a person who’s never once been right since he started posting on HHV.
Property taxes and owner upkeep costs aren’t an issue to owners who know what they’re doing. Obviously, they were an issue for you.
Gordon Head’s schools aren’t overflowing with students the way many West Shore schools are. Royal Bay Secondary has classroom space for 800. Its enrollment is over 1,100.
That would be “peddle,” genius. And what I’ve been “peddling” has so far panned out. What you and the other desperate renters have been peddling for the last 11 years has not.
“They’re not making more Gordon Heads—that is…”
No offence, but every time I go through Gordon Head it feels like last call at a bar when a sloppy drunk woman (or man, we do not discriminate) in a leopard-print tank top, black leather skirt (two sizes too small), and enough make-up on her face to re-paint a house tries to hang off your arm with a cigarette in one hand and two beers in the other. She’s trying to convince you, with her coarse-has-been-smoking-for-decades late 40s voice, to take her home but all you can do is scan for the exit to get the f*ck out.
Happy they’re not making anymore Gordon Heads.
(no offence Leo)
SweetHome
Sounds like a typical house in James Bay, Fairfield, Oak Bay, and Fernwood.
But I see your point.
How? If they’re are no spots there are no spots.
Clearly it isn’t. Since you’re attributing it to:
When really it’s about you, and the bullshit you pedal.
I bike from Gordon Head by the way, every day to work. I’ll take your non-reply as confirmation that you don’t bike downtown ever, because it’s not a great bike ride. You’re either going down shellbourne which is a death trap, or going up over the side of mt.doug to the lochside trail connector, and it’d be a minimum 45 minute trip for you in each direction.
Canadian Mortgage Credit Growth Drops to 22 Year Low Signalling the End of the Housing Boom
Canada’s mortgage credit growth continued to decelerate in Q3 2018. Per a recent report from RBC, mortgage credit growth decelerated to 3.2%, the weakest pace of growth in 22 years.
As credit growth begins to contract it is effectively reducing aggregate demand, not only for housing but also has a subsequent knock-on effect, slowing new spending and wage growth. This ultimately impacts debt servicing, as wage growth is needed to offset the increasing rise of interest payments. Per RBC, Interest payments rose at their fastest rate (14.8% y/y) since 2007.
This is also important to keep in mind for rent prices. Rents rise when the housing boom is in full swing because credit growth is abundant, this then pushes home prices higher, which propels banks to issue more loans, creating a self fulling prophecy. The creation of this new credit drives wages higher, improving the quality of the borrowers who are witnessing strong wage growth. As unemployment falls an inflow of new migrants come looking to participate in the exciting economic prospects, many of whom become employed in the booming construction sector. These inflows push the vacancy rates even lower.
However, like all cycles, they must eventually end, and the boom ultimately sows the seeds of its own demise. The slowdown of credit stalls wage growth, asset prices come to a standstill, and construction begins to slow. This results in job loss, and inflows of migrant workers turns to outflows. Today, we have home sales plunging, prices declining, and wage growth (a lagging indicator) is decelerating, construction remains strong but has also begun to slow.
https://vancitycondoguide.com/canadian-mortgage-credit-growth-drops-to-22-year-low-signalling-the-end-of-the-housing-boom/
too bad there is no way to track inter-provincial migration related purchases… I believe Victoria prices in the past 3 years was partly contributed by the ALBERTAN oil crash exodus .. 2 years ago… there was an albertan plate infront of me at every red light … 4 of the 6 houses sold on my block has an albertan plate parked in their drive way … now the albertan migration is over.. i wonder who else will keep the bubble going
Would that have something to do with your kid registering in the French Immersion program? Because that would be pertinent information in this discussion.
Your lashing out at me is understandable: things really haven’t gone the way you wanted.
So in other words Canadian rates will keep heading up as he said a few weeks back, then backed off because of economic risks, but now it’s no recession so no need to halt rate hikes. Poloz has a serious credibility problem.
Funny how the average and median dropped a massive 7% last month and the bears are the problem. Like Poloz, you have a credibility problem.
You’ve never experienced true paper gain fluctuation. It will be gut wrenching and cause much lost sleep. A whole generation will learn a valuable but painful lesson as house taxes/owner upkeep costs will never go down.
@guest_53564
Same thing with the neighbour blaming all the crisis on China alone.
I was listening to CBC the other day and found it interesting that the housing market downturn is newswhen it should have been news long ago. You know it’s really happening when it’s mainstream news (and happening everywhere). I think it’s funny listening to people talk about RE. You could have a friend who will argue the reasons RE will go up forever and then they read an article and they will change their tune so quickly. But didn’t agree with any of the data or reasons you pointed out 3 months ago but now CBC tells them the outlook is gloomy so they believe it. This is why I find the psychology of it all so fascinating! It’s one of those things that is tough to quantify but I think has a place in the debate.
Love the top comments!
Fyi for all there is no more dual agency as of June 15th, 2018.
A REALTOR® can still double-end a transaction but they cannot offer dual agency. One party has to be unrepresented and if you want to be an unrepresented party you have to read through a couple of different forms totalling 8 pages.
Tell me honestly, how many times have you biked downtown?
Makes sense why my kid was 42nd on the waitlist at Campus View.
You don’t live in Gordon Head, you live in a fucking bubble.
Well, this was an elderly person who accepted an offer from a real estate agent representing clients (property was not listed on the market). I believe the agent had him initial something to waive the problem with dual agency, and he will be paying a certain commission to that agent. He assumes it will all get worked out once the purchaser’s conditions come off (inspection) and he takes the papers to the lawyer.
Super odd….I wouldn’t try this in a million years with the new real estate council rules. Council is just waiting to make an example of a REALTOR® with a massive fine/displinary action.
In the past when I do this, I always had it subject to seller’s lawyer approving with a letter from a lawyer and subject to seller being satisfied with an appraisal (seller to select appraisal company). Then I would make the seller sign the appraisal before removing their lawyer and appraisal subjects.
@Barrister
Thanks for the reply; it reinforces my initial reaction. The problem is convincing this person that he is not savvy and might have cognitive issues. He has bought and sold at least 6 houses in his life, and nothing went off the rails, so he thinks he is savvy. The fact that was all at least 20 years ago does not seem to matter.
As a friend of mine said, “The older people get, the more you have to treat them like children.” (I will say this certainly does not apply to everyone, but the incidence of dementia does increase with age). The problem is that until they are declared incompetent, you can’t really make them do anything. Oh well, I can advise as best as I can.
I’m not too worried about my paper gains. They’re not making more Gordon Heads—that is, neighbourhoods in the core, on the ocean, that are not a bad drive or bike ride to downtown, with tons of green space and parks, containing a rec centre, not containing overcrowded schools, and located right beside UVic.
My paper gains will fluctuate, but looking long-term the trend will be steady up.
Interesting having a look at the various explanations given in each country that is experiencing a declining housing market. While there are many at the moment, a few of mention below are:
Canada: B20
Australia: Lender clampdown on I/O loans
England: Brexit
China: Central Policy
USA: Rate Hikes/Donald Trump
Israel: Excess currency appreciation
Hong Kong: Chinese capital controls
However, the near universality of the occurrence suggests a common factor. What could it be? 😛 One thing they do seem to have in common: Most commentators/analysts think their market will either be flat henceforth, or achieve a soft landing.
Almost like they are separate people with differing opinions and not a mass of conjoined people all trying to take your precious paper house gains away from you.
Young and riskless: Millennials taking a pass on stocks to emphasize savings
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/personal-finance/article-young-and-riskless-millennials-taking-a-pass-on-stocks-to-emphasize/
BoC Governor Stephen Poloz: No Recession in Canada in 2019
Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz isn’t buying into a prominent Bay Street economist’s recent warning that Canada could slide into recession next year, while likening risks to the economy as being akin to “fender benders,” rather than major shocks.
“We’re certainly not expecting a recession in 2019,” Poloz told CTV News Chief Anchor Lisa LaFlamme in an interview late Monday. “Our fundamentals are quite solid, so the things that we’re facing are more like fender benders than big events.”
https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/economy-faces-fender-benders-but-no-recession-in-2019-poloz-1.1185006
Vancouverites moving to Victoria had a negligible effect on us. Vancouverites moving to Victoria had a huge effect on us. Has anyone noticed that bears will claim either depending on how it suits their particular argument?
Is a one-month occurrence statistically significant? Also, I don’t recall Leo ever breaking down foreign buyer sales by neighbourhood (but I could be wrong). Do you have a link?
Some people need a sarcasm detector. The quote above was me auditioning for one of those “paid pumper” jobs that hawk keeps talking about. Sadly no one offered to pay me for my excellent work so I’ll just go back to my previous slightly bearish short term view.
The massive ups here were caused by this 2 fold. From the demand of people from Vancouver, as well as HAM. Lest we forget that Gordon head had 20% of their sales one month from foreign buyers.
I do my best to hold off of magical thinking. Plus, not everyone sees the world or a conversation as a zero-sum win/lose proposition. He debated just fine. You can do the same if you put your mind to it.
Same. Since Victoria’s ups weren’t caused by big Chinese money/organized crime/money laundering, it stands to reason that Victoria’s downs will look a lot different than Vancouver’s (and we’re seeing this).
You’re welcome!
Most bears think that by winning a debate their view of the future will become reality. Sadly, no.
You say it like it’s a bad thing 🙂
Oh but they will.
Makes sense.
Canadian house price slump makes buyers wary for 2019: Don Pittis
That’s the thing about these analysts and spokespeople. No one ever revisits their past predictions. On this site people’s completely anonymous predictions are skewered and put under the microscope, and that’s a good thing. It keeps people honest.
However these for these high profile analysts no one ever brings up their track record. I literally have never seen a single news article point to previously wrong predictions by the same people that they’re now printing predictions for.
I think we need something like tipranks that tracks these analysts’ performance over time and gives them a score: https://www.tipranks.com/analysts/adam-jonas
Ya it’ll be funny when/if people start arguing “It’ll never go up again”. It’ll be just as true as “it can never go down”, haha.
Local Fool: Maybe it is all the rain this month, but people are starting to agree on this site. Rather scary.
You are correct. Arguments for rising or falling markets are always repetitive.
I guess that depends what you mean. If your argument is the population is growing, then sure. If you’re saying it’s growing at a rate markedly stronger than the long term average, I disagree. This is a data driven question and isn’t really debatable in that way.
That’s fair relative to some other markets, but I’m unconvinced it will generate the market conditions you are betting on. But a bet is just that, so fair enough.
This is historically supportable. Victoria rarely gets large scale corrections, then again it’s rarely been this unaffordable. I happen to think a correction is actively beginning and will be more than what we’re used to, but I also do not believe we will experience the same level of disruption that Vancouver will.
+1
Thanks for responding Deryk.
Deryk: Definitely good advice as to buying what you can afford and, especially for first time buyers. One should always have a cash reserve of 10k for the unexpected. I understand the urge to max out for first time buyers but you are rolling dice with the devil.
It’s like you observed yesterday, spin doctors and also, liars. What makes a bubble? Loose credit and a compelling story. Missing one of those two? No bubble.
Nothing motivates a population to buy more than the perception of endless, rich Chinese cavalierly buying their kids RE as “New Year’s” gifts while you save for years to buy, hordes of “investors” floating overhead in bright yellow helicopters to scope out your neighborhoods to buy in, pictures of unmarked buses with blackout window tint (you just know they’re full of Chinese investors), or seeing line ups of paid actors of Asian descent, standing in line at a pre-sale offering.
They want your mind, and for you to act in a certain way. People are going to read about this garbage years from now, and won’t know whether to laugh or cry…
I see “Local Fool” responded to my post with a number of questions. (By the way….I do respect his or her postings.)
I’m afraid that I heard most of those same arguments several years ago when my family members bought our new properties in Sooke for $375,000.00. When I pointed out how inexpensive a new house with a legal suite was in Sooke compared to Vancouver….. I was asked all those same questions such as why I thought Victoria was a substitute to Vancouver…..and people would not come here in any numbers because it’s an island and where are they going to work etc etc.
Guess what? History proves me right. People have come here in droves despite some people thinking that no one would come here to live……. because….. that’s what people do. That is not likely to change. People want to live here.
There is a pattern to when and why people pack up and make their move. There are certainly connections and dots that line up and emerge if you look for them.
There are three questions I ask myself ….Why would anyone in Vancouver have sold their house when it was going up hundreds of thousands of dollars every year? And…..Why would they not sell their house and try and get out before they lose hundreds of thousands?
And ……Where are they going to go?
I’m betting that they will pick places like Victoria because it is a spectacular place to live. People selling their Vancouver house don;t need a “job” when buying a house in Victoria because the price difference is still so (((huge)))).
They can simply buy themselves a job (Start that dream business for example) or simply retire with one or even two million dollars in their pockets.
Or they might get creative and buy a duplex in Moncton NB for $200,000.00 and live off that rental income while they live in Victoria.
(They could buy five duplexes for one million dollars total …with incomes of $10,000.00 a month)
There are so many opportunities, so please forgive me if I get frustrated listening to people talking about a crash for Victoria.
Vancouver yes….Toronto …yes…..but my belief is that Victoria’s (sfh) will only experience a hiccup. Don;t believe me?….look at the charts.
Victoria doesn’t go up that much (compared to vancouver) and it doesn’t go down that much either…..but over the years it generally climbs upwards and people who weren’t able to buy, for whatever reason (circumstances, fear of price drops etc etc.) are left in the cold paying higher and higher rents for the rest of their lives.
My advice is buy what you can afford. Never risk your family home by over leveraging. Make sure you have the ability to “Hang on” during harder times such as losing your job, illness, tenant not being able to pay their rents, etc etc.
Buy when everyone else is panicking.
Local Fool: Real Estate in BC is like the wild west.
Given the state of current technology available to assist in finding data that should be redacted, this is just pure incompetence. It truly is depressing.
Real-estate marketers investigated over allegations of media manipulation
The Real Estate Council of British Columbia (RECBC) is investigating a series of incidents in which Metro Vancouver real-estate marketers have allegedly duped media to spur sales and inflate the perception of demand for real estate projects.
Its most recent investigation involves MAC Marketing Solutions and a charade that at least one of its employees executed on February 8. MAC owner Cameron McNeill publicly apologized for an employee who pretended in television interviews with CBC News and CTV News to be a customer.
The employee and another woman posing as her sister claimed they were both daughters of wealthy Chinese parents who wanted to celebrate Chinese New Year by buying them a Vancouver condo as a present.
https://biv.com/article/2013/02/real-estate-marketers-investigated-over-allegation
Sweet Home
I strongly advise that you do two things right away. First get him to a lawyer right away but also get a couple of good RE agents in right away to give him an idea of a fair price. Better still get a professional appraiser in. A red flag would be if the offer was more than a few percent under appraisal. This needs to be done as in yesterday. Not having the house on the market with just a dual agency is a pretty big red flag to start with in my opinion if you are dealing with an non savvy old person.
@guest_53519
Well, this was an elderly person who accepted an offer from a real estate agent representing clients (property was not listed on the market). I believe the agent had him initial something to waive the problem with dual agency, and he will be paying a certain commission to that agent. He assumes it will all get worked out once the purchaser’s conditions come off (inspection) and he takes the papers to the lawyer.
I have never sold a property, only purchased, and we put in our offer to purchase and then I guess it was the title and money transfer that our lawyer handled after. I did tell this person that whatever document he signed when the agent presented the offer to purchase is what he agreed to. Hopefully he didn’t get fleeced.
This brings up a question that someone here might have encountered: does a senior with questionable mental faculties have any recourse if they get taken in a real estate transaction?
That article is depressing. The mishandling of disclosure by crown prosecutors destroyed the case. I know the volume of disclosure is getting difficult to handle, but that is the (highly-paid) job that lawyers do for a living. Screwing it up multiple times looks very very bad.
Hey! How did you know my Xmas wish list? Well, except for the candy… and the stereo.
(I generally agree with you, but there is a decent percentage of the market that does not run on credit. Credit does run the “exuberance” level, though.)
Well, in my experience they are “OK”. I certainly don’t want to badmouth anyone but I have been involved in several property transactions involving them, and they were generally absent-minded and invariably switched the lawyer we had booked the appointment with.
For someone with a more “interesting” task than just a lowly property purchase, maybe they are great. They got the job done, but I am not sure I would go back at this point.
I have mostly dealt with lawyers in other places, so I am not sure what the competition is like here, so take my comments with a grain of salt.
Pros: generally updated house with views from Mt. Tolmie. Cons: 70 year-old house on 4150 sq. ft. lot. I don’t think you can draw conclusions from this because it is not a typical property.
Good summary LF. Of all my family, friends over the years who lived in Vancouver, none of them moved here. It’s a nice place to visit but boring to most who live any length of time in Van. You can’t match the entertainment and big city attractions regardless of traffic. It just comes with the territory.
The ones that retired and sold just bought nice condos there. Too many connections to up and leave.
People have always moved here from Van but they are not the lifeblood of the Victoria real estate market rather an ebb and flow as much as people leave here to live there for major careers.
What a joke!! Demand is floundering and prices are declining according to B.C. Assessments and about to show even bigger declines relative to the BC Assessments from earlier this year which will be released in a few weeks. However, it might be a good time to buy in about 36 months.
3491 Mayfair Dr MLS 397252
Assessed: $1,088,000
Original ask: $1,250,000
Sold: $1,037,500 (5% under assessed after 132 DOM)
Nice looking 2,757 square foot home on Mt. Tolmie with ‘breathtaking’ views.
Nothing to see here folks, real estate market is doing fine…
Local Fool, I agree with you.
Since were discussing options to Vancouver, personally I’d rather live in either Vernon or Penticton.
Both are the same distance by plane from Vancouver that Victoria is. Both have more amenities, better winter sports, far better powder, better curling, better hockey rinks. Yes, clearing driveways is not my idea of fun. But since the RH % is drier it’s not that bad.
Summers are nicer, and nothing beats the local Okanagan Fruit and Veggies. That being said Forest Fires are becoming a real problem, but we seem to all get the smoke now anyways. My point: Victoria is nice, but people are notoriously tough to get to know.
Coming from a 4th Gen Victoria born/raised. We will probably retire in the Interior for reasons listed above, but that’s down the line.
Lastly, BC Business Mag ranked Victoria 35/38 in cities to live. And of the metrics used only Port Alberni had lower household income. Both for Under 35 and above (separate categories).
Thanks for the stats Leo. I’m not sure if it’s possible to determine, but it would be useful to see the current ask price vs. assessed price to show the (likely) upcoming trends in sale price vs. assessed price. Furthermore, to take it one step farther, if it’s possible to incorporate listings that did not sell and were willingly taken off the market to be re-listed at a later time (i.e. in the spring), well, that may show what we’re in for in the spring.
“That assessed value is a powerful psychological tool though, and I expect to see more unrealistic asking prices for listings once owners get the letter saying their house is worth more.”
Leo, Are you able to create a long term chart (at least prior to 2008?) for % over/under assess? Your comment really hit the nail and would love to see a chart if possible. Cheers and Happy Holidays!
You’ve maintained this thesis for a while, and it essentially relies on a functionally impossible “hermetically sealed, equity-based market” paradigm. You don’t seem to note that everything is completely interconnected and dependent on macro factors. Every sale works its way up and down the property chain; at some point in the chain there must be a buyer accessing credit. This is why RE is a cyclical market. There is now so much debt in the system that the rate hikes are tanking sales, despite the fact that they are still negative in real terms.
But let’s employ some mathemagical Canadian logic and presume for argument that none of that matters in RE.
Are you watching the data? Why are sales volumes falling in Victoria? Where are all of these rescue buyers you speak of? And who will pay the countless Vancouverites the two million for their home, so tens of thousands can come here with those millions? And why would they come here in the first place? Don’t they have families and jobs? Do you have any idea how much money that is, relative to what this region earns? Are there that many rich people, to support an entire metro market?
Do you think that Victoria, a small city accessible only by boat or airplane, is a substitute market for Vancouver? Do you believe that the Vancouver market could actually suffer a notable decline while Victoria doesn’t, closing the perpetual price spread between the two markets?
There is no data, present or historical, that remotely supports the outcome you’re envisioning. And if you’ve bought that many houses, I certainly hope your portfolio is more diverse than bubbled up BC RE.
The only way that either market isn’t going to suffer broad declines is if the credit spigots turn on again, but given the debt levels, they would have to turn on far more than before as much of the debt was piled on at rates that were notably lower than now, yet the volumes were already dropping in Vancouver at that time. Are central bankers that nuts? Perhaps, but they sure as heck ain’t going that way at the moment.
Along with Amy, who posted this, I would also be interested in a real estate lawyer name, as I know someone who accepted an offer will need to do the paperwork.
I think Amy needs to start with a really good commercial appraiser.
Not sure what you mean by “someone who accepted an offer will need to do the paperwork?”
Do they need conveyancing services or they need the offer reviewed? If they are a seller they need a seller’s lawyer review subject otherwise in absence of any other subjects there is no turning back.
I think given what’s happening in Vancouver, most home owners who do sell there would be a little gun shy about buying property in Victoria . If u just sold a home for $2 million last week that you could have got $2.5 million for last year, are you going to be in a hurry and buy a house a ferry ride away?
I’ve been following House hunt Victoria for several years now. (It is much appreciated.)
Trying to predict the future of real estate is not easy as most will agree.
I find it useful to look at other places and try and figure out how Victoria will be effected. That’s why six years ago…. when I looked at the prices for a post war, junk bungalow on a 33 foot lot in vancouver, selling at well over two million dollars, I thought that $375,000.00 for a house in Sooke with a legal suite was a good deal…That’s why my family bought 3 of those houses. ( At the time, I was laughed at by some people on house hunt because they thought $350 thousand for a house in Sooke was insane.)
Those newer houses in Sooke with a legal suite are now worth $565,000.00 each. (In Victoria you get a broken down old house for $565,000.00 ……if you can find one.)
I now look at Vancouver prices dropping and I read about people on House hunt Victoria biting their nails and talking up the pending doom and gloom.
But I have to wonder where those Vancouver people who are selling their $2million plus homes are going to go. My guess is that many of them will search out places like Victoria where they can still buy a beautiful big house for around $1million on a lot twice the size of a Vancouver lot and still put $1million in the bank.
That’s why I think Victoria will “not” drop in price in any dramatic way. People here still do not understand that Victoria is quite inexpensive. There are tens of thousands of people likely to be thinking about selling their 2million dollar plus homes in Vancouver because they know the bubble there is going to burst. They have to go somewhere.
That’s my humble opinion for what it is worth:)
So……Keep the head and don’t miss opportunities. This spring should be interesting.
Mullin DeMeo are the big players here https://www.realestatelawvictoria.com/
Have not heard any complaints, but have only used them for simple transactions.
You already sound like you have the job,lol.
Dow tanks lower to December decline levels not seen since the Great Depression. Yep load up suckas.
Assessments will be going up for most people this year, and unless the market picks up I wouldn’t be surprised to see the average place sell for under assessed value in 2019.
I was thinking about this a couple of weeks ago when the TC dropped the article that assessments would be going up……it is going be a very long year on the blog with the average property most likely selling below assessment. Prices might not actually change in reality, but the bears will have a field day with the below assessed sales.
The market already did.
Where do I get one of these “paid pumper” jobs? I could use the extra cash.
There has never been a better time to buy Victoria real estate for long term wealth creation! Take advantage of low interest rates! Buy now, they aren’t making any more land you know! Golf in paradise while your Winnipeg friends shovel snow! Victoria real estate will always hold it’s value.
Maintain autopilot. Keep dollar cost averaging into something diversified and low cost.
Anyone who still has a lot of years of retirement savings ahead of them should absolutely be cheering when the markets fall.
LF,
When the last group of paid pumpers cry uncle as we are now witnessing, you know it’s going to be a painful dumpage coming. They hope no one listened to them the last 3 years maxing out their credit while the sane people (like me), screamed caution. But there will the gwac’s who will go down in a massive ball of flames. No sympathy there in the slightest.
That’s not really it. I’ve seen this before in other examples which I quoted often. None of it’s unique or new (which is part of my annoyance in how people repeatedly fall for it).
It’s when it applies to you, to your market, to something you may have a stake in now or at some point, that fosters a deeper level of understanding via resonance. Think of it by analogy.
“Most automotive service clerks are crooks out to rip you off,” but you’ve never actually had that experience. Then you go to Jiffy Lube and presto, you have the rip-off experience up front and personal.
Did you learn anything new? Not exactly in one sense, but sort of in another. It’s just somehow clearer than it was before. Or think of it as knowing the lyrics to music, but then coming to understand the music too.
Not explaining it very well but hopefully you get what I mean…
Perhaps, or people hearing what they want to hear. We all have that weakness though, whether we’re educated or not. It just depends on how effective an antidote that education is.
Is it just me or was that a rare Marmot sighting?
Local Fool: Did you miss economics 101. If you are an economist and you have a great job hang on to it and spin the story the CEO tells you to spin it. Local Fool, having read your posts for a while now, I am pretty sure that you never paid any attention to the spin doctors. I know that it is sad that a lot of people do listen but it seems to partially stem from a real failure in our education system.
Mathew too bad you deleted that post. It was a good one!
“I wouldn’t be surprised to see the average place sell for under assessed value in 2019. That assessed value is a powerful psychological tool though, and I expect to see more unrealistic asking prices for listings once owners get the letter saying their house is worth more.”
I agree it shouldn’t be a surprise. The unrealistic owners should check VREB: AVG for Single-Family-Greater-Victoria down -7.6% for November compared to October and -5.7% compared to November last year. About $70,000 down in just one month.
Maybe people think November is usually a “down” month, which is not because last year it was an “up” month. Same for 2016, it was an “up” month. A big “up” month in fact. Here are some numbers about November.
2016 10.2% (LM) 37.2% (LY)
2017 5.6% (LM) 5.9% (LY)
2018 -7.6% (LM) -5.7% (LY)
LM — means compared to last month (i.e. Oct)
LY — means compared to same month last year
A similar picture can be seen if median is used instead.
Quick, the Markets are crashing!
Sell! Sell! Sell!!!!
The past 13 months of stocks gains have been wiped out and some say this is just the beginning. Will our Spring real estate market follow?
Rant time!
One of the things I am really understanding more and more of, is how aggressive and useless this market information “machine” is, from people with vested interests.
Look at the quote above – almost anyone could have determined this years ago with an hour or two of study. I mean, seriously? You’re just seeing this now? Bulls**t. Anyone who has been looking at the data knows full well that anticipating a downturn isn’t genius, perspicacity, clairvoyance, or insider information. It’s simple market dynamics unfolding as a consequence from loose credit combined with a compelling story (Chinese).
The first signs of the contraction appeared almost 3 years ago in Vancouver, and yet as recently as a few months ago, that same guy above was all up, up and up – the same as many analysts, RE boards and even governments. It was as if everyone in society collectively gave not a single thought as to how Canadians would be able to access enough credit to continue to drive the market higher. Indeed, the RE market as a whole runs on credit – it’s not the same as candy bars, stereos and drywall. I ask myself, how the heck do people not pay attention to this most basic principle? Where do these analysts go to school?
This is why housing bubbles are far easier to identify than stock bubbles. Sure, RE speculators can come in, and can even dominate the market for a time. But sooner or later, that retreats and we’re once again left with the elemental variables – residents of a human community that need shelter, that need to pay for that shelter, and must pay for that shelter by participating in the economy. Market can’t pay the prices? Use credit. Can’t get enough credit, or the credit costs too much for the market to bear? Prices have to fall or there’s no market. This is grade 10 stuff, folks.
And here we are, with the data getting worse all the time. And now that it’s deteriorated to the point where there’s no plausible way of denying it, all these pundits are blithely acting like – well yes, of course markets correct. We’re too reliant on RE as it is, and that’s a problem with potentially unpleasant consequences. Then they downgrade their rosy forecasts, then downgrade again, then again, then again, and it’s all just so surprising.
Thanks, tweedle-dee and company. Real useful.
Quick, the Markets are on sale!
Buy! Buy! Buy!
Interesting !!
Leo S, how could you overlook this HHV comment for the ages:
Date: 2017 (but could easily be 2014, 2015, 2016, or 2018)
Author: hawk
Someone might be running out of cutlery.
CIBC gets it. A year and a half to begin to feel the effects of the interest rate hikes. Interesting. The fun house is now the sad house.
“In a report released Monday, economists at CIBC predicted the housing market would be a drag on Canada’s economic growth in the coming year.
“It was a good run while it lasted, but the sun has officially set on the days of heady housing market growth fuelling Canada’s national economy,” Benjamin Tal and Royce Mendes wrote.
And that could be bad news because housing investment is more important to Canada’s economy “than at any other time on record,” Tal and Mendes wrote.
Residential investment accounts for 7.5 per cent of Canada’s economy, just off a record high. The share of people employed in home construction and real estate is also near a record high, the CIBC economists noted.
“As a result, any slowdown will be magnified in terms of its impact on the Canadian economy,” at least compared to previous downturns, they added.
“The rebound appears to have run its course.”
CREA chief economist Gregory Klump
It takes a year and a half for interest rate hikes to be fully felt in the housing market, so most of the rate hikes from the Bank of Canada since last summer have yet to have an impact, Tal and Mendes wrote. The fact that the market has turned down so sharply even before the interest rate hikes’ impact is “concerning,” they added.”
https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2018/12/17/canadian-home-sales-cibc_a_23620414/?utm_hp_ref=ca-business
I find the CMHC chart interesting but I am left feeling that I am not sure what it is actually measuring much less what it is telling us.
I dont think your selection of comments is arbitrary it is just ones that you agree with.
LeoS: Thank you for the numbers; I am sure we are all grateful for all your hard work.
🙂
More about the money laundering case and why charges were stayed: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/money-laundering-trial-stayed-privilege-1.4946799
Excellent insight in those comments!
Agree on that post from Beancounter! 🙂
Other than that, your list is arbitrary and capricious. 😛